The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multifocus Image Fusion and Restoration With Sparse Representation
Abstract
To obtain an image with every object in focus, we always need to fuse images taken from the same view point with different focal settings. Multiresolution transforms, such as pyramid decomposition and wavelet, are usually used to solve this problem. In this paper, a sparse representation-based multifocus image fusion method is proposed. In the method, first, the source image is represented with sparse coefficients using an overcomplete dictionary. Second, the coefficients are combined with the choose-max fusion rule. Finally, the fused image is reconstructed from the combined sparse coefficients and the dictionary. Furthermore, the proposed fusion scheme can simultaneously resolve the image restoration and fusion problem by changing the approximate criterion in the sparse representation algorithm. The proposed method is compared with spatial gradient (SG)-, morphological wavelet transform (MWT)-, discrete wavelet transform (DWT)-, stationary wavelet transform (SWT)-, curvelet transform (CVT)-, and nonsubsampling contourlet transform (NSCT)-based methods on several pairs of multifocus images. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach performs better in both subjective and objective qualities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code
Burt, P., & Adelson, E. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcom.1983.1095851 · Cited by 6,077
Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381607a0 · Cited by 5,694
Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries
Elad, M., & Aharon, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.881969 · Cited by 5,321
Cited by
Multilevel features convolutional neural network for multifocus image fusion
Yang, Y., Nie, Z., Huang, S., Lin, P., & Wu, J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging · doi:10.1109/tci.2018.2889959 · Cited by 103
Xu, S., Ji, L., Wang, Z., Li, P., Sun, K., Zhang, C., & Zhang, J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging · doi:10.1109/tci.2020.3039564 · Cited by 47
Multi-Focus Image Fusion: Algorithms, Evaluation, and a Library
Zafar, R., Farid, M. S., & Khan, M. H. (2020) · Journal of Imaging · doi:10.3390/jimaging6070060 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, B., & Li, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 884-892
- ISSN
- 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9662
- OpenAlex
- W2168783614
- Cited by
- 749
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multifocus Image Fusion and Restoration With Sparse Representation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tim.2009.2026612
- The paper
- Yang, B., & Li, S. (2010). Multifocus Image Fusion and Restoration With Sparse Representation. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2009.2026612
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.