The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The curvelet transform for image denoising
Abstract
We describe approximate digital implementations of two new mathematical transforms, namely, the ridgelet transform and the curvelet transform. Our implementations offer exact reconstruction, stability against perturbations, ease of implementation, and low computational complexity. A central tool is Fourier-domain computation of an approximate digital Radon transform. We introduce a very simple interpolation in the Fourier space which takes Cartesian samples and yields samples on a rectopolar grid, which is a pseudo-polar sampling set based on a concentric squares geometry. Despite the crudeness of our interpolation, the visual performance is surprisingly good. Our ridgelet transform applies to the Radon transform a special overcomplete wavelet pyramid whose wavelets have compact support in the frequency domain. Our curvelet transform uses our ridgelet transform as a component step, and implements curvelet subbands using a filter bank of a; trous wavelet filters. Our philosophy throughout is that transforms should be overcomplete, rather than critically sampled. We apply these digital transforms to the denoising of some standard images embedded in white noise. In the tests reported here, simple thresholding of the curvelet coefficients is very competitive with "state of the art" techniques based on wavelets, including thresholding of decimated or undecimated wavelet transforms and also including tree-based Bayesian posterior mean methods. Moreover, the curvelet reconstructions exhibit higher perceptual quality than wavelet-based reconstructions, offering visually sharper images and, in particular, higher quality recovery of edges and of faint linear and curvilinear features. Existing theory for curvelet and ridgelet transforms suggests that these new approaches can outperform wavelet methods in certain image reconstruction problems. The empirical results reported here are in encouraging agreement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The transformation of poisson, binomial and negative-binomial data
ANSCOMBE, F. J. (1948) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/35.3-4.246 · Cited by 1,300
Wedgelets: nearly minimax estimation of edges
Donoho, D. L. (1999) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1018031261 · Cited by 638
Self-citation
Cited by
Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries
Elad, M., & Aharon, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.881969 · Cited by 5,321
Fast Discrete Curvelet Transforms
Candès, E., Demanet, L., Donoho, D., & Ying, L. (2006) · Multiscale Modeling & Simulation · doi:10.1137/05064182x · Cited by 2,573
Self-citationSparse Representation for Color Image Restoration
Mairal, J., Elad, M., & Sapiro, G. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.911828 · Cited by 1,716
A New SURE Approach to Image Denoising: Interscale Orthonormal Wavelet Thresholding
Luisier, F., Blu, T., & Unser, M. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.891064 · Cited by 623
Fast 3D reconstruction method for differential phase contrast X-ray CT
McCann, M. T., Nilchian, M., Stampanoni, M., & Unser, M. (2016) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.24.014564 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Starck, J.-L., Candes, E. J., & Donoho, D. L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 670-684
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132680427
- Cited by
- 2,253
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 52.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.