The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is Denoising Dead?
Abstract
Image denoising has been a well studied problem in the field of image processing. Yet researchers continue to focus attention on it to better the current state-of-the-art. Recently proposed methods take different approaches to the problem and yet their denoising performances are comparable. A pertinent question then to ask is whether there is a theoretical limit to denoising performance and, more importantly, are we there yet? As camera manufacturers continue to pack increasing numbers of pixels per unit area, an increase in noise sensitivity manifests itself in the form of a noisier image. We study the performance bounds for the image denoising problem. Our work in this paper estimates a lower bound on the mean squared error of the denoised result and compares the performance of current state-of-the-art denoising methods with this bound. We show that despite the phenomenal recent progress in the quality of denoising algorithms, some room for improvement still remains for a wide class of general images, and at certain signal-to-noise levels. Therefore, image denoising is not dead--yet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s303 · Cited by 17,923
Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife
Efron, B. (1979) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344552 · Cited by 17,602
Least squares quantization in PCM
Lloyd, S. (1982) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1982.1056489 · Cited by 15,836
Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory
Sengijpta, S. K. (1995) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1995.10484391 · Cited by 11,076
Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering
Dabov, K., Foi, A., Katkovnik, V., & Egiazarian, K. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.901238 · Cited by 9,283
Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: Estimation theory
Prasad, K. V. (1994) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/0967-0661(94)90195-3 · Cited by 7,902
Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory
Trees, H. L. V. (1968) · Cited by 5,969
Mathematical Methods of Statistics.
Geary, R. C., & Cramer, H. (1947) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2226151 · Cited by 5,927
Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries
Elad, M., & Aharon, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.881969 · Cited by 5,321
Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1998) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118625590 · Cited by 5,024
Cited by
FFDNet: Toward a Fast and Flexible Solution for CNN-Based Image Denoising
Zhang, K., Zuo, W., & Zhang, L. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2018.2839891 · Cited by 2,678
Toward Convolutional Blind Denoising of Real Photographs
Guo, S., Yan, Z., Zhang, K., Zuo, W., & Zhang, L. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00181 · Cited by 1,221
The Little Engine That Could: Regularization by Denoising (RED)
Romano, Y., Elad, M., & Milanfar, P. (2017) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/16m1102884 · Cited by 934
Self-citationReal Image Denoising With Feature Attention
Anwar, S., & Barnes, N. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00325 · Cited by 784
Graph Laplacian Regularization for Image Denoising: Analysis in the Continuous Domain
Pang, J., & Cheung, G. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2651400 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Chatterjee, P., & Milanfar, P.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 895-911
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W1997147589
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 20.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is Denoising Dead? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2009.2037087
- The paper
- Chatterjee, P., & Milanfar, P. (2010). Is Denoising Dead? IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2009.2037087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.