The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
${\bf S}_{3}$: A Spectral and Spatial Measure of Local Perceived Sharpness in Natural Images
Abstract
This paper presents an algorithm designed to measure the local perceived sharpness in an image. Our method utilizes both spectral and spatial properties of the image: For each block, we measure the slope of the magnitude spectrum and the total spatial variation. These measures are then adjusted to account for visual perception, and then, the adjusted measures are combined via a weighted geometric mean. The resulting measure, i.e., S(3) (spectral and spatial sharpness), yields a perceived sharpness map in which greater values denote perceptually sharper regions. This map can be collapsed into a single index, which quantifies the overall perceived sharpness of the whole image. We demonstrate the utility of the S(3) measure for within-image and across-image sharpness prediction, no-reference image quality assessment of blurred images, and monotonic estimation of the standard deviation of the impulse response used in Gaussian blurring. We further evaluate the accuracy of S(3) in local sharpness estimation by comparing S(3) maps to sharpness maps generated by human subjects. We show that S(3) can generate sharpness maps, which are highly correlated with the human-subject maps.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2005) · doi:10.1002/047174882x · Cited by 13,791
A no-reference objective image sharpness metric based on the notion of just noticeable blur (JNB)
Ferzli, R., & Karam, L. J. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2008.2011760 · Cited by 758
A no-reference perceptual image sharpness metric based on a cumulative probability of blur detection
Narvekar, N. D., & Karam, L. J. (2009) · 2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience · doi:10.1109/qomex.2009.5246972 · Cited by 208
Cited by
Image database TID2013: Peculiarities, results and perspectives
Ponomarenko, N., Jin, L., Ieremeiev, O., Lukin, V., Egiazarian, K., Astola, J., Vozel, B., Chehdi, K., Carli, M., Battisti, F., et al. (2015) · Signal Processing: Image Communication · doi:10.1016/j.image.2014.10.009 · Cited by 1,241
Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Quality
Ghadiyaram, D., & Bovik, A. C. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2015.2500021 · Cited by 782
Image super-resolution using progressive generative adversarial networks for medical image analysis
Mahapatra, D., Bozorgtabar, B., & Garnavi, R. (2019) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.10.005 · Cited by 308
Zhang, L., Li, L., Yang, A., Shen, Y., & Yang, M. (2017) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2017.04.016 · Cited by 294
A Fast Wavelet-Based Algorithm for Global and Local Image Sharpness Estimation
Vu, P. V., & Chandler, D. M. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2012.2199980 · Cited by 271
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vu, C. T., Phan, T. D., & Chandler, D. M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 934-945
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2117117414
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ${\bf S}_{3}$: A Spectral and Spatial Measure of Local Perceived Sharpness in Natural Images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2011.2169974
- The paper
- Vu, C. T., Phan, T. D., & Chandler, D. M. (2012). ${\bf S}_{3}$: A Spectral and Spatial Measure of Local Perceived Sharpness in Natural Images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2011.2169974
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.