Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Quality
Open accessAbstract
Most publicly available image quality databases have been created under highly controlled conditions by introducing graded simulated distortions onto high-quality photographs. However, images captured using typical real-world mobile camera devices are usually afflicted by complex mixtures of multiple distortions, which are not necessarily well-modeled by the synthetic distortions found in existing databases. The originators of existing legacy databases usually conducted human psychometric studies to obtain statistically meaningful sets of human opinion scores on images in a stringently controlled visual environment, resulting in small data collections relative to other kinds of image analysis databases. Toward overcoming these limitations, we designed and created a new database that we call the LIVE In the Wild Image Quality Challenge Database, which contains widely diverse authentic image distortions on a large number of images captured using a representative variety of modern mobile devices. We also designed and implemented a new online crowdsourcing system, which we have used to conduct a very large-scale, multi-month image quality assessment (IQA) subjective study. Our database consists of over 350 000 opinion scores on 1162 images evaluated by over 8100 unique human observers. Despite the lack of control over the experimental environments of the numerous study participants, we demonstrate excellent internal consistency of the subjective data set. We also evaluate several top-performing blind IQA algorithms on it and present insights on how the mixtures of distortions challenge both end users as well as automatic perceptual quality prediction models. The new database is available for public use at http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/ChallengeDB/index.html.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The FRIQUEE model has been observed to achieve SOTA performance on UGC/consumer video/picture databases like LIVEChallenge, CVD2014, and KoNViD-1k.
“The FRIQUEE model [41] has been observed to achieve SOTA performance both on UGC/consumer video/picture databases like LIVEChallenge [14], CVD2014 [12], and KoNViD-1k [10] by leveraging a bag of NSS features drawn from diverse color spaces and perceptually motivated transform domains.”
From UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892 · see citing works
Self-citationMultiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment
Wang, Z., Simoncelli, E. P., & Bovik, A. C. (2004) · The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2003.1292216 · Cited by 6,253 · cited 1× · see citing works
“LE III PERFORMANCE ON LEGACY LIVE IQA DATABASE [12]. ITALICS INDICATE NR IQA MODELS. -NA- INDICATES DATA NOT REPORTED IN THE CORRESPONDING PAPER. SROCC PLCC PSNR 0.86 0.86 SSIM [50] 0.91 0.91 MS-SSIM [51] 0.95 0.95 CBIQ [7] 0.89 0.90 LBIQ [5] 0.91 0.91 DIIVINE [3] 0.92 0.93 BLIINDS-II [4] 0.91 0.92 BRISQUE [2] 0.94 0.…”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationNo-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain
Mittal, A., Moorthy, A. K., & Bovik, A. C. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2012.2214050 · Cited by 6,064 · see citing works
Self-citationA new standardized method for objectively measuring video quality
Pinson, M. H., & Wolf, S. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting · doi:10.1109/tbc.2004.834028 · Cited by 1,182 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Study framework: We adopted a single stimulus continuous procedure [42] to obtain quality ratings on images where subjects reported their quality judgments by dragging the slider located below the image on the rating interface.”
MethodBlind Prediction of Natural Video Quality
Saad, M. A., Bovik, A. C., & Charrier, C. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2014.2299154 · Cited by 471 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…and controlling the perceptual effects of these distortions will require the development of powerful blind video quality assessment models, such as [53], and new VQA databases representative of human opinions of modern, realistic videos captured by current mobile video camera devices and…”
BackgroundSelf-citationRRED Indices: Reduced Reference Entropic Differencing for Image Quality Assessment
Soundararajan, R., & Bovik, A. C. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2011.2166082 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Waterloo Exploration Database: New Challenges for Image Quality Assessment Models
Ma, K., Duanmu, Z., Wu, Q., Wang, Z., Yong, H., Li, H., & Zhang, L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2016.2631888 · Cited by 789 · see citing works
KonIQ-10k: An Ecologically Valid Database for Deep Learning of Blind Image Quality Assessment
Hosu, V., Lin, H., Sziranyi, T., & Saupe, D. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2020.2967829 · Cited by 759 · see citing works
KADID-10k: A Large-scale Artificially Distorted IQA Database
Lin, H., Hosu, V., & Saupe, D. (2019) · 2019 Eleventh International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) · doi:10.1109/qomex.2019.8743252 · Cited by 523 · see citing works
UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content
Tu, Z., Wang, Y., Birkbeck, N., Adsumilli, B., & Bovik, A. C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2021.3072221 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
“The FRIQUEE model [39] has been observed to achieve SOTA performance both on UGC/consumer video/picture databases like LIVE-Challenge [14], CVD2014 [12], and KoNViD-1k [10] by leveraging a bag of NSS features drawn from diverse color spaces and perceptually motivated transform domains.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationKim, J., Zeng, H., Ghadiyaram, D., Lee, S., Zhang, L., & Bovik, A. C. (2017) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2017.2736018 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Self-citationAssessing Image Quality Issues for Real-World Problems
Chiu, T.-Y., Zhao, Y., & Gurari, D. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00370 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Why no-reference metrics for image and video quality lack accuracy and reproducibility
Pinson, M. H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting · doi:10.1109/tbc.2022.3191059 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
No-reference image quality assessment based on global awareness
Hu, Z., Yang, G., Du, Z., Huang, X., Zhang, P., & Liu, D. (2024) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0310206 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ghadiyaram, D., & Bovik, A. C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- ORCID
- Bovik, Alan C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 372-387
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2148848374
- Cited by
- 782
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 70 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 11 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 23.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation through the Division of Information and Intelligent Systems (IIS-1116656)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Keywords
- image quality assessment, image quality database, mobile camera images, perceptual quality prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review