Cited by 782Image and Video Quality AssessmentImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesDigital Media Forensic Detection

Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Quality

Open access
Ghadiyaram, Deepti, Bovik, Alan C.·2016·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

Most publicly available image quality databases have been created under highly controlled conditions by introducing graded simulated distortions onto high-quality photographs. However, images captured using typical real-world mobile camera devices are usually afflicted by complex mixtures of multiple distortions, which are not necessarily well-modeled by the synthetic distortions found in existing databases. The originators of existing legacy databases usually conducted human psychometric studies to obtain statistically meaningful sets of human opinion scores on images in a stringently controlled visual environment, resulting in small data collections relative to other kinds of image analysis databases. Toward overcoming these limitations, we designed and created a new database that we call the LIVE In the Wild Image Quality Challenge Database, which contains widely diverse authentic image distortions on a large number of images captured using a representative variety of modern mobile devices. We also designed and implemented a new online crowdsourcing system, which we have used to conduct a very large-scale, multi-month image quality assessment (IQA) subjective study. Our database consists of over 350 000 opinion scores on 1162 images evaluated by over 8100 unique human observers. Despite the lack of control over the experimental environments of the numerous study participants, we demonstrate excellent internal consistency of the subjective data set. We also evaluate several top-performing blind IQA algorithms on it and present insights on how the mixtures of distortions challenge both end users as well as automatic perceptual quality prediction models. The new database is available for public use at http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/ChallengeDB/index.html.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tip.2015.2500021

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The FRIQUEE model has been observed to achieve SOTA performance on UGC/consumer video/picture databases like LIVEChallenge, CVD2014, and KoNViD-1k.

    “The FRIQUEE model [41] has been observed to achieve SOTA performance both on UGC/consumer video/picture databases like LIVEChallenge [14], CVD2014 [12], and KoNViD-1k [10] by leveraging a bag of NSS features drawn from diverse color spaces and perceptually motivated transform domains.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghadiyaram, D., & Bovik, A. C.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
2016-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
372-387
ISSN
  • 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0042
OpenAlex
W2148848374
Cited by
782
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 11 · 2014: 1
FWCI
23.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation through the Division of Information and Intelligent Systems (IIS-1116656)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
image quality assessment, image quality database, mobile camera images, perceptual quality prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review