Cited by 283Image and Video Quality AssessmentAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesDigital Media Forensic Detection

Deep Convolutional Neural Models for Picture-Quality Prediction: Challenges and Solutions to Data-Driven Image Quality Assessment

Kim, Jongyoo, Zeng, Hui, Ghadiyaram, Deepti, Lee, Sanghoon, Zhang, Lei, Bovik, Alan C.·2017·IEEE Signal Processing Magazine

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been shown to deliver standout performance on a wide variety of visual information processing applications. However, this rapidly developing technology has only recently been applied with systematic energy to the problem of picture-quality prediction, primarily because of limitations imposed by a lack of adequate ground-truth human subjective data. This situation has begun to change with the development of promising data-gathering methods that are driving new approaches to deep-learning-based perceptual picture-quality prediction. Here, we assay progress in this rapidly evolving field, focusing, in particular, on new ways to collect large quantities of ground-truth data and on recent CNN-based picture-quality prediction models that deliver excellent results in a large, real-world, picture-quality database.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/msp.2017.2736018

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transfer learning is a promising technique for the blind UGC-VQA problem.

    “This suggests that transfer learning is a promising technique for the blind UGC-VQA problem, consistent with conclusions drawn for picture-quality prediction [63].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J., Zeng, H., Ghadiyaram, D., Lee, S., Zhang, L., & Bovik, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
Published
2017-11
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
130-141
ISSN
  • 1053-5888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0792
OpenAlex
W2767836774
Cited by
283
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 4
FWCI
14.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Signal Processing Magazine (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
image quality assessment, convolutional neural networks, perceptual image quality, ground truth data collection, image quality database

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review