Cited by 449Face recognition and analysisFace and Expression RecognitionBiometric Identification and Security

Robust Face Recognition via Multimodal Deep Face Representation

Open access
Ding, Changxing, Tao, Dacheng·2015·IEEE Transactions on Multimedia

Abstract

Face images appearing in multimedia applications, e.g., social networks and digital entertainment, usually exhibit dramatic pose, illumination, and expression variations, resulting in considerable performance degradation for traditional face recognition algorithms. This paper proposes a comprehensive deep learning framework to jointly learn face representation using multimodal information. The proposed deep learning structure is composed of a set of elaborately designed convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and a three-layer stacked auto-encoder (SAE). The set of CNNs extracts complementary facial features from multimodal data. Then, the extracted features are concatenated to form a high-dimensional feature vector, whose dimension is compressed by SAE. All of the CNNs are trained using a subset of 9,000 subjects from the publicly available CASIA-WebFace database, which ensures the reproducibility of this work. Using the proposed single CNN architecture and limited training data, 98.43% verification rate is achieved on the LFW database. Benefitting from the complementary information contained in multimodal data, our small ensemble system achieves higher than 99.0% recognition rate on LFW using publicly available training set.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmm.2015.2477042

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, C., & Tao, D.
Affiliations
University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
Published
2015-11
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
2049-2058
ISSN
  • 1520-9210 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0077
OpenAlex
W1951319388
Cited by
449
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 3
FWCI
38.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Australian Research Council (FT-130101457, DP-120103730, DP-140102164)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
Keywords
face recognition, stacked autoencoder, convolutional neural networks, pose variation, illumination variation, facial expression variation, CASIA-WebFace, Labeled Faces in the Wild, robust face recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review