Cited by 541Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace recognition and analysisFace and Expression Recognition

Static facial expression analysis in tough conditions: Data, evaluation protocol and benchmark

Dhall, Abhinav, Goecke, Roland, Lucey, Simon, Gedeon, Tom·2011·2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops)

Abstract

Quality data recorded in varied realistic environments is vital for effective human face related research. Currently available datasets for human facial expression analysis have been generated in highly controlled lab environments. We present a new static facial expression database Static Facial Expressions in the Wild (SFEW) extracted from a temporal facial expressions database Acted Facial Expressions in the Wild (AFEW) [9], which we have extracted from movies. In the past, many robust methods have been reported in the literature. However, these methods have been experimented on different databases or using different protocols within the same databases. The lack of a standard protocol makes it difficult to compare systems and acts as a hindrance in the progress of the field. Therefore, we propose a person independent training and testing protocol for expression recognition as part of the BEFIT workshop. Further, we compare our dataset with the JAFFE and Multi-PIE datasets and provide baseline results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccvw.2011.6130508

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. dhall, 2011, Acted Facial Expressions in the Wild Database

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dhall, A., Goecke, R., Lucey, S., & Gedeon, T.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Venue
2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-11
Pages
2106-2112
ISSN
2473-9936 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083021723
Cited by
541
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.17
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (publishedVersion)
  • University of Canberra Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
facial expression recognition, static facial expressions, benchmark, JAFFE

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review