Cited by 1,199Cryptography and Residue ArithmeticCryptography and Data SecurityCoding theory and cryptography

An improved algorithm for computing logarithms overGF(p)and its cryptographic significance (Corresp.)

Pohlig, S., Hellman, M.·1978·IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Abstract

A cryptographic system is described which is secure if and only if computing logarithms overGF(p)is infeasible. Previously published algorithms for computing this function requireO(p^{1/2})complexity in both time and space. An improved algorithm is derived which requiresO =(\log^{2} p)complexity ifp - 1has only small prime factors. Such values ofpmust be avoided in the cryptosystem. Constructive uses for the new algorithm are also described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tit.1978.1055817

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If r is composite, the discrete logarithm problem may be decomposed into problems in subgroups of orders dividing r.

    “If r is composite, the discrete logarithm problem may be decomposed into problems in subgroups of orders dividing r , as shown by Pohlig and Hellman [68].”

    From How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits (2021) · cites this paper as Pohlig and Hellman [68]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pohlig, S., & Hellman, M.
Affiliations
  • MIT Lincoln Laboratory (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Published
1978-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
106-110
ISSN
  • 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9654
OpenAlex
W1981455414
Cited by
1,199
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 50
FWCI
43.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
Keywords
discrete logarithm problem, finite field GF(p), algorithmic complexity, cryptographic security, ciphers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review