The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fundamental Limits of Cooperation
Open accessAbstract
Cooperation is viewed as a key ingredient for interference management in wireless networks. This paper shows that cooperation has fundamental limitations. First, it is established that in systems that rely on pilot-assisted channel estimation, the spectral efficiency is upper-bounded by a quantity that does not depend on the transmit powers; in this framework, cooperation is possible only within clusters of limited size, which are subject to out-of-cluster interference whose power scales with that of the in-cluster signals. Second, an upper bound is also shown to exist if the cooperation extends to an entire (large) system operating as a single cluster; here, pilot-assisted transmission is necessarily transcended. Altogether, it is concluded that cooperation cannot in general change an interference-limited network to a noise-limited one. Consequently, the existing literature that routinely assumes that the high-power spectral efficiency scales with the log-scale transmit power provides only a partial characterization. The complete characterization proposed in this paper subdivides the high-power regime into a degree-of-freedom regime, where the scaling with the log-scale transmit power holds approximately, and a saturation regime, where the spectral efficiency hits a ceiling that is independent of the power. Using a cellular system as an example, it is demonstrated that the spectral efficiency saturates at power levels of operational relevance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shi, Q., Razaviyayn, M., Luo, Z.-Q., & He, C. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2011.2147784 · Cited by 2,129
Cited by
Andrews, J. G., Buzzi, S., Choi, W., Hanly, S. V., Lozano, A., Soong, A. C. K., & Zhang, J. C. (2014) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2014.2328098 · Cited by 8,106
Self-citationEnergy and spectral efficiency of very large multiuser MIMO systems
Ngo, H. Q., Larsson, E. G., & Marzetta, T. L. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2013.020413.110848 · Cited by 3,173
Cell-Free Massive MIMO Versus Small Cells
Ngo, H. Q., Ashikhmin, A., Yang, H., Larsson, E. G., & Marzetta, T. L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2017.2655515 · Cited by 2,757
Ubiquitous cell-free massive MIMO communications
Interdonato, G., Björnson, E., Quoc Ngo, H., Frenger, P., & Larsson, E. G. (2019) · EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking · doi:10.1186/s13638-019-1507-0 · Cited by 646
Energy Efficiency in Wireless Networks via Fractional Programming Theory
Zappone, A., & Jorswieck, E. (2015) · Foundations and Trends in Communications and Information Theory · doi:10.1561/0100000088 · Cited by 513
Metadata
- Authors
- Lozano, A., Heath, R. W., & Andrews, J. G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5213-5226
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9654
- OpenAlex
- W2013491227
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 80.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fundamental Limits of Cooperation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2013.2253153
- The paper
- Lozano, A., Heath, R. W., & Andrews, J. G. (2013). Fundamental Limits of Cooperation. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2013.2253153
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.