Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 707

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detection of Daily Activities and Sports With Wearable Sensors in Controlled and Uncontrolled Conditions

Ermes, M., Parkka, J., Mantyjarvi, J., Korhonen, I.·2008·IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine

Abstract

Physical activity has a positive impact on people's well-being, and it may also decrease the occurrence of chronic diseases. Activity recognition with wearable sensors can provide feedback to the user about his/her lifestyle regarding physical activity and sports, and thus, promote a more active lifestyle. So far, activity recognition has mostly been studied in supervised laboratory settings. The aim of this study was to examine how well the daily activities and sports performed by the subjects in unsupervised settings can be recognized compared to supervised settings. The activities were recognized by using a hybrid classifier combining a tree structure containing a priori knowledge and artificial neural networks, and also by using three reference classifiers. Activity data were collected for 68 h from 12 subjects, out of which the activity was supervised for 21 h and unsupervised for 47 h. Activities were recognized based on signal features from 3-D accelerometers on hip and wrist and GPS information. The activities included lying down, sitting and standing, walking, running, cycling with an exercise bike, rowing with a rowing machine, playing football, Nordic walking, and cycling with a regular bike. The total accuracy of the activity recognition using both supervised and unsupervised data was 89% that was only 1% unit lower than the accuracy of activity recognition using only supervised data. However, the accuracy decreased by 17% unit when only supervised data were used for training and only unsupervised data for validation, which emphasizes the need for out-of-laboratory data in the development of activity-recognition systems. The results support a vision of recognizing a wider spectrum, and more complex activities in real life settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/titb.2007.899496

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. ashton, 1993, Exercise Health Benefits and Risks
  2. 1994, Physical Activity Fitness and Health International Processings and Consensus Statement
  3. 2002, WHO World Health Report
  4. prkk, 0, palantir context data collection, annotation and psv file format, Proc Pervasive 2004 Workshop, 9

Cited by

See all 707

Metadata

Authors
Ermes, M., Parkka, J., Mantyjarvi, J., & Korhonen, I.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine
Published
2008-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
20-26
ISSN
1089-7771 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127127580
Cited by
707
References
20
FWCI
60.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of Daily Activities and Sports With Wearable Sensors in Controlled and Uncontrolled Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/titb.2007.899496
The paper
Ermes, M., Parkka, J., Mantyjarvi, J., & Korhonen, I. (2008). Detection of Daily Activities and Sports With Wearable Sensors in Controlled and Uncontrolled Conditions. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine. https://doi.org/10.1109/titb.2007.899496

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.