Cited by 294Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringECG Monitoring and Analysis

Real-time sleep apnea detection by classifier combination

Xie, B., Hlaing Minn·2012·IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine

Abstract

To find an efficient and valid alternative of polysomnography (PSG), this paper investigates real-time sleep apnea and hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) detection based on electrocardiograph (ECG) and saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO(2)) signals, individually and in combination. We include ten machine-learning algorithms in our classification experiment. It is shown that our proposed SpO (2) features outperform the ECG features in terms of diagnostic ability. More importantly, we propose classifier combination to further enhance the classification performance by harnessing the complementary information provided by individual classifiers. With our selected SpO(2) and ECG features, the classifier combination using AdaBoost with Decision Stump, Bagging with REPTree, and either kNN or Decision Table achieves sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy all around 82% for a minute-based real-time SAHS detection over 25 sleep-disordered-breathing suspects' full overnight recordings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/titb.2012.2188299

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent works in diagnosis/decision making involve estimating severity of health episodes of patients with chronic disease, sleep issues such as polysomnography and apnea, estimation and classification of health conditions, and emotion recognition.

    “Some examples of recent works in this area involve estimating the severity of health episodes of patients suffering chronic disease [44–46], sleep issues such as polysomnography and apnea [47,48], estimation and classification of health conditions [49,50], and emotion recognition [51].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xie, B., & Minn, H.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine
Published
2012-05
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
469-477
ISSN
  • 1089-7771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0032
OpenAlex
W2131111256
Cited by
294
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
sleep apnea detection, sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome, real-time diagnosis, electrocardiogram, oxygen saturation, classifier combination, ensemble learning, AdaBoost, bagging, REPTree, k-nearest neighbors, decision tables, sleep-disordered breathing, polysomnography alternative
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Systems, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Oximetry, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Sleep Apnea Syndromes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review