The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning to Predict Bus Arrival Time From Heterogeneous Measurements via Recurrent Neural Network
Abstract
Bus arrival time prediction intends to improve the level of the services provided by transportation agencies. Intuitively, many stochastic factors affect the predictability of the arrival time, e.g., weather and local events. Moreover, the arrival time prediction for a current station is closely correlated with that of multiple passed stations. Motivated by the observations above, this paper proposes to exploit the long-range dependencies among the multiple time steps for bus arrival prediction via recurrent neural network (RNN). Concretely, RNN with long short-term memory block is used to “correct” the prediction for a station by the correlated multiple passed stations. During the correlation among multiple stations, one-hot coding is introduced to fuse heterogeneous information into a unified vector space. Therefore, the proposed framework leverages the dynamic measurements (i.e., historical trajectory data) and the static observations (i.e., statistics of the infrastructure) for bus arrival time prediction. In order to fairly compare with the state-of-the-art methods, to the best of our knowledge, we have released the largest data set for this task. The experimental results demonstrate the superior performances of our approach on this data set.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Last year, Pang et al. [5] adopted recurrent neural network with long short-term memory block (RNN-LSTM) to capture long-term dependencies of bus arrival times at different location points, which further improves the prediction results.”
From BusTime: Which is the Right Prediction Model for My Bus Arrival Time? (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Watkins, K. E., Ferris, B., Borning, A., Rutherford, G. S., & Layton, D. (2011) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.06.010 · Cited by 384
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- seborg, 2011, Process Dynamics and Control
- 10.1115/1.3662552 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2068984.2068985 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ITSC.2012.6338767 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CSO.2012.111 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0893-6080(98)00074-4 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11750-009-0103-6 · doi:10.1007/s11750-009-0103-6
- rasmussen, 2006, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
- 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000714 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICDM.2014.107 · DOI
- zadeh, 2012, A survey on application of artificial intelligence for bus arrival time prediction, Inf Theory Appl, 1, 516
- harris, 2012, Digital Design and computer Architecture
- 10.3141/2034-08 · DOI
- 10.1109/TITS.2016.2547184 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:6(608) · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2003)129:6(608 · Paper page
- 10.3141/1676-23 · DOI
- 10.1049/iet-its:20080013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/15472450600981009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:5(429) · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2002)128:5(429
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:6(664) · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2003)129:6(664 · Paper page
- 10.1162/neco.1990.2.4.490 · DOI · Paper page
- liu, 2009, A neural network model for travel time prediction, Proc IEEE Int Conf Intell Comput Intell Syst, 752
- 10.1016/j.trc.2005.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
- bailey, 2007, Public Transportation and Petroleum Savings in the U S Reducing Dependence on Oil
- 10.1007/s12469-012-0057-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.443 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.trc.2011.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
- holroyd, 1966, Waiting times for buses in central London, Traffic Eng Control, 3, 158
- 10.5038/2375-0901.14.3.6 · DOI
- altinkaya, 2013, Urban us arrival time predication: A review of computational models, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 2, 164
- 2015, Wold Population Prospects
- 10.1109/72.279181 · DOI · Paper page
- chung, 2014, Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling, Proc Conf Neural Inf Process Syst Workshop Deep Learn, 1
- 10.1109/89.242489 · DOI · Paper page
- cristianini, 2000, An Introduction to Support Vector Machines
- glorot, 2010, Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks, J Mach Learn Res, 9, 249
- 10.1109/TITS.2004.837813 · DOI · Paper page
- hagan, 1996, Neural Network Design
- 10.5038/2375-0901.17.2.3 · doi:10.5038/2375-0901.17.2.3
- 10.1061/40960(320)13 · doi:10.1061/40960(320)13
Cited by
BusTime: Which is the Right Prediction Model for My Bus Arrival Time?
Liu, D., Sun, J., & Wang, S. (2020) · 2020 5th IEEE International Conference on Big Data Analytics (ICBDA) · doi:10.1109/icbda49040.2020.9101265 · Cited by 11
Zahin, M. A., Tarannom, R., & Adu-Gyamfi, Y. (2025) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7756700/v1
Metadata
- Authors
- Pang, J., Huang, J., Du, Y., Yu, H., Huang, Q., & Yin, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3283-3293
- ISSN
- 1524-9050
- 1558-0016
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 2
- Licence
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61672069, 61872333, 61620106009)
- Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China
- Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (KM201610005034)
- Beijing Municipal Commission of Transport Science and Technology Project
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning to Predict Bus Arrival Time From Heterogeneous Measurements via Recurrent Neural Network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tits.2018.2873747
- The paper
- Pang, J., Huang, J., Du, Y., Yu, H., Huang, Q., & Yin, B. (2019). Learning to Predict Bus Arrival Time From Heterogeneous Measurements via Recurrent Neural Network. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2018.2873747
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.