The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Random projection-based multiplicative data perturbation for privacy preserving distributed data mining
Abstract
This paper explores the possibility of using multiplicative random projection matrices for privacy preserving distributed data mining. It specifically considers the problem of computing statistical aggregates like the inner product matrix, correlation coefficient matrix, and Euclidean distance matrix from distributed privacy sensitive data possibly owned by multiple parties. This class of problems is directly related to many other data-mining problems such as clustering, principal component analysis, and classification. This paper makes primary contributions on two different grounds. First, it explores independent component analysis as a possible tool for breaching privacy in deterministic multiplicative perturbation-based models such as random orthogonal transformation and random rotation. Then, it proposes an approximate random projection-based technique to improve the level of privacy protection while still preserving certain statistical characteristics of the data. The paper presents extensive theoretical analysis and experimental results. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed technique is effective and can be successfully used for different types of privacy-preserving data mining applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Capacity of Multi‐antenna Gaussian Channels
Telatar, E. (1999) · European Transactions on Telecommunications · doi:10.1002/ett.4460100604 · Cited by 11,234
Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications
Hyvärinen, A., & Oja, E. (2000) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(00)00026-5 · Cited by 8,705
k-ANONYMITY: A MODEL FOR PROTECTING PRIVACY
SWEENEY, L. (2002) · International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1142/s0218488502001648 · Cited by 8,571
Independent component analysis, A new concept?
Comon, P. (1994) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/0165-1684(94)90029-9 · Cited by 8,205
Independent Component Analysis
(2004) · Independent Component Analysis · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3717.003.0014 · Cited by 7,903
Approximate nearest neighbors: towards removing the curse of dimensionality
Indyk, P., & Motwani, R. (1998) · Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '98 · doi:10.1145/276698.276876 · Cited by 4,188
How to generate and exchange secrets
Yao, A. C.-C. (1986) · 27th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1986) · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1986.25 · Cited by 3,733
Goldreich, O., Micali, S., & Wigderson, A. (1987) · Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM conference on Theory of computing - STOC '87 · doi:10.1145/28395.28420 · Cited by 3,590
Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias
Warner, S. L. (1965) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2283137 · Cited by 3,263
Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias
Warner, S. L. (1965) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1965.10480775 · Cited by 3,255
Cited by
A General Survey of Privacy-Preserving Data Mining Models and Algorithms
Aggarwal, C. C., & Yu, P. S. (2008) · Advances in Database Systems · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70992-5_2 · Cited by 469
Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning: Threats and Solutions
Al-Rubaie, M., & Chang, J. M. (2019) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msec.2018.2888775 · Cited by 444
A Systematic Review on Healthcare Analytics: Application and Theoretical Perspective of Data Mining
Islam, M. S., Hasan, M. M., Wang, X., Germack, H. D., & Noor-E-Alam, M. (2018) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare6020054 · Cited by 267
Cancellable biometrics and annotations on biohash
Teoh, A. B. J., Kuan, Y. W., & Lee, S. (2008) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2007.12.002 · Cited by 213
Distributed data mining: a survey
Zeng, L., Li, L., Duan, L., Lu, K., Shi, Z., Wang, M., Wu, W., & Luo, P. (2012) · Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1007/s10799-012-0124-y · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, K., Kargupta, H., & Ryan, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 92-106
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160553465
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 35.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Random projection-based multiplicative data perturbation for privacy preserving distributed data mining. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2006.14
- The paper
- Liu, K., Kargupta, H., & Ryan, J. (2006). Random projection-based multiplicative data perturbation for privacy preserving distributed data mining. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2006.14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.