Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias

Sampling Techniques, Second Edition

G., C. W. (1963)

Some Theory of Sampling

E., D. W. (1950)

Sample Survey Methods and Theory, Volume I

H., H. M. (1953)

Sample Survey Methods and Theory, Volume II

H., H. M. (1953)

Sampling Opinions

F., S. F. (1963)

Random projection-based multiplicative data perturbation for privacy preserving distributed data mining

Liu, K., Kargupta, H., & Ryan, J. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2006.14 · Cited by 555 · see citing works

Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports: Tests using the item count technique

Holbrook, A. L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2010) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfp065 · Cited by 540 · see citing works

Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses

Lyu, L., Yu, H., Ma, X., Chen, C., Sun, L., Zhao, J., Yang, Q., & Yu, P. S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3216981 · Cited by 548 · see citing works

Differential Privacy for Deep and Federated Learning: A Survey

Ouadrhiri, A. E., & Abdelhadi, A. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3151670 · Cited by 445 · see citing works

A Statistical Framework for Differential Privacy

Wasserman, L., & Zhou, S. (2010) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08651 · Cited by 398 · see citing works

Multivariate Regression Analysis for the Item Count Technique

Imai, K. (2011) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2011.ap10415 · Cited by 326 · see citing works

Scrambled randomized response methods for obtaining sensitive quantitative data

Eichhorn, B. H., & Hayre, L. S. (1983) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/0378-3758(83)90002-2 · Cited by 284 · see citing works

Building a RAPPOR with the Unknown: Privacy-Preserving Learning of Associations and Data Dictionaries

Fanti, G. C., Pihur, V., & Erlingsson, Ú. (2016) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.1515/popets-2016-0015 · Cited by 21 · see citing works

Differential Privacy for Statistics: What we Know and What we Want to Learn

Dwork, C., & Smith, A. (2010) · Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality · doi:10.29012/jpc.v1i2.570 · Cited by 269 · see citing works

The Effect of the Question on Survey Responses: A Review

Kalton, G., & Schuman, H. (1982) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2981421 · Cited by 259 · see citing works

Estimation of sensitivity level of personal interview survey questions

Gupta, S., Gupta, B. C., & Singh, S. (2002) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/s0378-3758(01)00137-9 · Cited by 202 · see citing works

Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test

Basu*, D. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5825-9_28 · Cited by 197 · see citing works

How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacy

Ponomareva, N., Hazimeh, H., Kurakin, A., Xu, Z., Denison, C., McMahan, H. B., Vassilvitskii, S., Chien, S., & Thakurta, A. G. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.14649 · Cited by 166 · see citing works

Privacy preserving mining of association rules

Evfimievski, A., Srikant, R., Agrawal, R., & Gehrke, J. E. (2003) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2003.09.001 · Cited by 158 · see citing works

Data Swapping: Variations on a Theme by Dalenius and Reiss

Fienberg, S. E., & McIntyre, J. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-25955-8_2 · Cited by 158 · see citing works

Counting hard-to-count populations: the network scale-up method for public health

Bernard, H. R., Hallett, T. B., Iovita, A., et al. (2010) · Sexually Transmitted Infections · doi:10.1136/sti.2010.044446 · Cited by 152 · see citing works

Distributed Private Data Analysis: Simultaneously Solving How and What

Beimel, A., Nissim, K., & Omri, E. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85174-5_25 · Cited by 150 · see citing works

A stratified Warner's randomized response model

Kim, J., & Warde, W. D. (2002) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/s0378-3758(02)00500-1 · Cited by 150 · see citing works

Identifying indicators of illegal behaviour: carnivore killing in human-managed landscapes

John, F. A. V. S., Keane, A. M., Edwards‐Jones, G., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1228 · Cited by 143 · see citing works

Do print and Web surveys provide the same results?

Huang, H. (2004) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.09.012 · Cited by 138 · see citing works

Estimating Illegal Resource Use at a Ugandan Park with the Randomized Response Technique

Solomon, J. N., Jacobson, S. K., Wald, K. D., et al. (2007) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871200701195365 · Cited by 138 · see citing works

Randomized response estimates for doping and illicit drug use in elite athletes

Striegel, H., Ulrich, R., & Simon, P. D. (2009) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.07.026 · Cited by 137 · see citing works

A class of estimators for quantitative sensitive data

Diana, G., & Perri, P. F. (2009) · Statistical Papers · doi:10.1007/s00362-009-0273-1 · Cited by 136 · see citing works

Asking Sensitive Questions Using the Crosswise Model: An Experimental Survey Measuring Plagiarism

Jann, B., Jerke, J., & Krumpal, I. (2011) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfr036 · Cited by 128 · see citing works

Mean and sensitivity estimation in optional randomized response models

Gupta, S., Shabbir, J., & Sehra, S. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2010.03.010 · Cited by 122 · see citing works

Federated Latent Dirichlet Allocation: A Local Differential Privacy Based Framework

Wang, Y., Tong, Y., & Shi, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i04.6096 · Cited by 122 · see citing works

Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test

Basu, D. (1980) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1980.10477512 · Cited by 115 · see citing works

Anonymity in the dictator game revisited

Franzén, A., & Pointner, S. (2011) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.09.005 · Cited by 114 · see citing works

Measuring Voter Turnout By Using The Randomized Response Technique: Evidence Calling Into Question The Method's Validity

Holbrook, A. L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2010) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfq012 · Cited by 109 · see citing works

Privacy via the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform

Kenthapadi, K., Korolova, A., Mironov, I., & Mishra, N. (2013) · Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality · doi:10.29012/jpc.v5i1.625 · Cited by 111 · see citing works

Combining List Experiment and Direct Question Estimates of Sensitive Behavior Prevalence

Aronow, P. M., Coppock, A., Crawford, F. W., & GREEN, D. P. (2015) · Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology · doi:10.1093/jssam/smu023 · Cited by 110 · see citing works

Manipulation Attacks in Local Differential Privacy

Cheu, A., Smith, A., & Ullman, J. (2021) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp40001.2021.00001 · Cited by 119 · see citing works

A Comprehensive Survey on Local Differential Privacy toward Data Statistics and Analysis

Wang, T., Zhang, X., Feng, J., & Yang, X. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20247030 · Cited by 106 · see citing works

Trusted AI in Multiagent Systems: An Overview of Privacy and Security for Distributed Learning

Ma, C., Li, J., Wei, K., Liu, B., Ding, M., Yuan, L., Han, Z., & Vincent Poor, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2023.3306773 · Cited by 96 · see citing works

From Extreme to Mainstream: How Social Norms Unravel

Bursztyn, L., Egorov, G., & Fiorin, S. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23415 · Cited by 90 · see citing works

PPeFL: Privacy-Preserving Edge Federated Learning With Local Differential Privacy

Wang, B., Chen, Y., Jiang, H., & Zhao, Z. (2023) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3264259 · Cited by 90 · see citing works

Metamorphic Testing and Certified Mitigation of Fairness Violations in NLP Models

Ma, P., Wang, S., & Liu, J. (2020) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2020/64 · Cited by 80 · see citing works

Academic economists behaving badly? A survey on three areas of unethical behavior

List, J. F., Bailey, C., Euzent, P. J., & Martin, T. (2001) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2001.tb00058.x · Cited by 129 · see citing works

A mixed randomized response model

Kim, J., & Warde, W. D. (2004) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2004.03.011 · Cited by 75 · see citing works

Using randomized response from a complex survey to estimate a sensitive proportion in a dichotomous finite population

Chaudhuri, A. (2001) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/s0378-3758(00)00210-x · Cited by 74 · see citing works

Locally Differentially Private Frequency Estimation with Consistency

Wang, T., Lopuhaä-Zwakenberg, M., Li, Z., Škorić, B., & Li, N. (2020) · Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2020.24157 · Cited by 86 · see citing works

Private decayed predicate sums on streams

Bolot, J. C., Fawaz, N., Muthukrishnan, S., et al. (2013) · International Conference on Database Theory · doi:10.1145/2448496.2448530 · Cited by 71 · see citing works

Sample Surveys With Sensitive Questions: A Nonrandomized Response Approach

Tan, M. T., Tian, G., & Tang, M. (2009) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/tast.2009.0002 · Cited by 66 · see citing works

Conditions Under Which a Bogus Pipeline Procedure Enhances the Validity of Self‐Reported Cigarette Smoking: A Meta‐Analytic Review1

Aguinis, H., Pierce, C. A., & Quigley, B. M. (1993) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01092.x · Cited by 65 · see citing works

vqSGD: Vector Quantized Stochastic Gradient Descent

Gandikota, V., Kane, D. M., Maity, R. K., & Mazumdar, A. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2022.3161620 · Cited by 80 · see citing works

The turnover intentions of information systems auditors

Muliawan, A. D., Green, P. F., & Robb, D. A. (2009) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2009.03.001 · Cited by 64 · see citing works

Privacy Preservation in Database Applications: A Survey

Zhou, S., Li, F., Tao, Y., & Xiao, X. (2009) · Chinese Journal of Computers · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1016.2009.00847 · Cited by 62 · see citing works

Pan-private algorithms via statistics on sketches

Mir, D., Muthukrishnan, S., Nikolov, A., & Wright, R. N. (2011) · ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS) · doi:10.1145/1989284.1989290 · Cited by 60 · see citing works

An Axiomatic View of Statistical Privacy and Utility

Kifer, D., & Lin, B.-R. (2012) · Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality · doi:10.29012/jpc.v4i1.610 · Cited by 60 · see citing works

Binarizing Split Learning for Data Privacy Enhancement and Computation Reduction

Pham, N. D., Abuadbba, A., Gao, Y., Phan, K. T., & Chilamkurti, N. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2023.3274391 · Cited by 61 · see citing works

A comparison of estimators for randomized response sampling with continuous distributions from a dichotomous population

Franklin, L. A. (1989) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610928908829913 · Cited by 60 · see citing works

Evaluation of cigarette smoking among adolescents: The Muscatine study

Lauer, R. M., Akers, R. L., Massey, J., et al. (1982) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/0091-7435(82)90045-7 · Cited by 60 · see citing works

The logistic regression model with response variables subject to randomized response

van den Hout, A., van der Heijden, P. G. M., & Gilchrist, R. S. (2007) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2006.12.002 · Cited by 58 · see citing works

Surveys with negative questions for sensitive items

Esponda, F., & Guerrero, V. M. (2009) · Statistics & Probability Letters · doi:10.1016/j.spl.2009.08.019 · Cited by 57 · see citing works

Item Count Technique in estimating the proportion of people with a sensitive feature

Chaudhuri, A., & Christofides, T. C. (2006) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2006.01.004 · Cited by 55 · see citing works

Reasons of Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion: Reflections from Pakistan

Mughal, M. M. (2012) · Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies · doi:10.22610/jebs.v4i4.320 · Cited by 54 · see citing works

Item Sum: A New Technique for Asking Quantitative Sensitive Questions

Trappmann, M., Krumpal, I., Kirchner, A., & Jann, B. (2013) · Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology · doi:10.1093/jssam/smt019 · Cited by 53 · see citing works

Some alternative strategies to Moors’ model in randomized response sampling

Singh, S., Singh, R., & Mangat, N. S. (2000) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/s0378-3758(99)00092-0 · Cited by 52 · see citing works

An Epidemiologic Approach to the Study of Child Molestation

David Finkelhor, B., & LEWIS, I. A. (1988) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb50852.x · Cited by 62 · see citing works

Differentially Private Representation for NLP: Formal Guarantee and An Empirical Study on Privacy and Fairness

Lyu, L., He, X., & Li, Y. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.213 · Cited by 51 · see citing works

The future of economics

Cicarelli, J. (1984) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/0040-1625(84)90088-x · Cited by 49 · see citing works

Efficient Use of Two Decks of Cards in Randomized Response Sampling

Odumade, O., & Singh, S. (2009) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610920802225065 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

Evaluating compliance with a computer assisted randomized response technique: a qualitative study into the origins of lying and cheating

Lensvelt‐Mulders, G., & Boeije, H. (2005) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.001 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

A note on the comparison of some randomized response procedures

Guerriero, M., & Sandri, M. F. (2006) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2006.07.004 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

Robust privacy-utility tradeoffs under differential privacy and Hamming distortion

Sankar, L., Kalantari, K., & Sarwate, A. D. (2018) · Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) · doi:10.7282/t3-kcnb-jb12 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

Effect of Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion on Personal Income Tax Administration in Nigeria

Adebisi, J. F., & Gbegi, D. O. (2013) · American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.11634/232907811301328 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

Measuring Social Desirability Effects on Self-Reported Turnout Using the Item Count Technique

Comșa, M., & Postelnicu, C. (2012) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/eds019 · Cited by 46 · see citing works

Cryptographic Randomized Response Techniques

Ambainis, A., Jakobsson, M., & Lipmaa, H. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24632-9_31 · Cited by 46 · see citing works

RRreg: An R Package for Correlation and Regression Analyses of Randomized Response Data

Heck, D. W., & Moshagen, M. (2018) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v085.i02 · Cited by 44 · see citing works

Why reports of outcome evaluations are often biased or uninterpretable

Moskowitz, J. M. (1993) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(93)90032-4 · Cited by 43 · see citing works

The feasibility of computer-assisted survey interviewing in Africa: Experience from two rural districts in Kenya

Hewett, P., Erulkar, A. S., & Mensch, B. (2003) · doi:10.31899/pgy6.1071 · Cited by 44 · see citing works

Web-Based Methods.

Reips, U. (2006) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11383-006 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

Bilateral Privacy-Preserving Worker Selection in Spatial Crowdsourcing

Wang, H., Yang, Y., Wang, E., Liu, X., Wei, J., & Wu, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2022.3186023 · Cited by 40 · see citing works

On randomized response surveys for estimating a proportion

Nayak, T. K. (1994) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610929408831448 · Cited by 40 · see citing works

Underreporting of Gender-Based Violence in Kerala, India: An Application of the List Randomization Method

Javaid, S. U., Joseph, G., Chellaraj, G., Andrés, L., Rajan, S. I., & Solotaroff, J. L. (2017) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-8044 · Cited by 37 · see citing works

Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy Trilemma

Chen, W., Kairouz, P., & Özgür, A. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2022.3218772 · Cited by 79 · see citing works

Modeling survey response bias – with an analysis of the demand for an advanced electronic device

Hsiao, C. H., & Sun, B. (1998) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00053-0 · Cited by 38 · see citing works

Extensions of Mangat's randomized-response model

Kim, J., Tebbs, J. M., & An, S.-W. (2004) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2004.10.005 · Cited by 38 · see citing works

Plagiarism in Student Papers: Prevalence Estimates Using Special Techniques for Sensitive Questions

Coutts, E., Jann, B., Krumpal, I., & Näher, A. (2011) · Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik · doi:10.1515/jbnst-2011-5-612 · Cited by 39 · see citing works

Estimating illicit drug use through telephone interviews and the randomized response technique

Weissman, A., Steer, R. A., & Lipton, D. S. (1986) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/0376-8716(86)90054-2 · Cited by 38 · see citing works

Measurement Error, Unit Nonresponse, and Self-Reports of Abortion Experiences

Peytchev, A., Peytcheva, E., & Groves, R. M. (2010) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfq002 · Cited by 37 · see citing works

Improving estimates of prevalence rates of sensitive behaviors: The randomized lists technique and consideration of self‐reported honesty

Zimmerman, R. S., & Langer, L. M. (1995) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499509551781 · Cited by 36 · see citing works

Estimation of population mean when coefficient of variation is known using scrambled response technique

Singh, H. P., & Mathur, N. (2004) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2004.01.002 · Cited by 35 · see citing works

Estimation in Truncated Parameter Spaces.

Casella, G., & Moors, J. J. A. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289026 · Cited by 35 · see citing works

An Adversarial Approach to Protocol Analysis and Selection in Local Differential Privacy

Gürsoy, M. E., Liu, L., Chow, K.-H., Truex, S., & Wei, W. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2022.3170242 · Cited by 34 · see citing works

Procuring honest responses indirectly

Chua, T. C., & Tsui, A. K. C. (2000) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/s0378-3758(00)00109-9 · Cited by 34 · see citing works

Optimal Trading Mechanism Based on Differential Privacy Protection and Stackelberg Game in Big Data Market

Li, C., He, A., Wen, Y., Liu, G., & Chronopoulos, A. T. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2023.3242338 · Cited by 35 · see citing works

Randomized response in stratified sampling

Christofides, T. C. (2003) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2003.11.001 · Cited by 32 · see citing works

On the Privacy-Utility Trade-Off With and Without Direct Access to the Private Data

Zamani, A., Oechtering, T. J., & Skoglund, M. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2023.3326070 · Cited by 31 · see citing works

Student (Mis)Use of Generative AI Tools for University-Related Tasks

Reiter, L., Jörling, M., Fuchs, C., Working group ‘Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education’, & Böhm, R. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2462083 · Cited by 33 · see citing works

Local Differential Privacy: Tools, Challenges, and Opportunities

Ye, Q., & Hu, H. (2020) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-3281-8_2 · Cited by 32 · see citing works

Randomized response trials: a unified approach for qualitative data

Arnab, R. (1996) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610929608831756 · Cited by 31 · see citing works

Respondent hazards in the unrelated question randomized response model

Greenberg, B., Kuebler, R. R., Abernathy, J. R., et al. (1977) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/0378-3758(77)90005-2 · Cited by 31 · see citing works

LDPGuard: Defenses Against Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols

Huang, K., Ouyang, G., Ye, Q., Hu, H., Zheng, B., Zhao, X., Zhang, R., & Zhou, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2024.3358909 · Cited by 30 · see citing works

Logistic regression analysis of randomized response data with missing covariates

Hsieh, S., Lee, S. M., & Shen, P. (2009) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2009.09.020 · Cited by 30 · see citing works

A social cognition approach to health psychology: Philosophical and methodological issues

Abraham, C., & Hamfson, S. E. (1996) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870449608400254 · Cited by 30 · see citing works

Pointwise Maximal Leakage

Saeidian, S., Cervia, G., Oechtering, T. J., & Skoglund, M. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2023.3304378 · Cited by 29 · see citing works

Data Poisoning Attacks and Defenses to LDP-Based Privacy-Preserving Crowdsensing

Zheng, Z., Li, Z., Huang, C., Long, S., Li, M., & Shen, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2024.3363507 · Cited by 30 · see citing works

P2P collaborative filtering with privacy

Kaleli, C., & Polat, H. (2010) · TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCES · doi:10.3906/elk-0808-21 · Cited by 29 · see citing works

Measuring associations with randomized response

Fox, J. A., & Tracy, P. E. (1984) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/0049-089x(84)90020-6 · Cited by 29 · see citing works

A ZIP model accounting for response bias in randomized response

Cruyff, M., Böckenholt, U., & van der Heijden, P. G. M. (2007) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)

Estimation of a Finite Population Mean and Total Using Population Ranks of Sample Units

Öztürk, Ö. (2015) · Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics · doi:10.1007/s13253-015-0231-4 · Cited by 14 · see citing works

Randomized Response Procedure for the Estimation of the Population Ratio using Ranked Set Sampling

Moreno, A. S., Bouza, C. N., Sautto, J. M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Mathematics and Statistics · doi:10.3844/jmssp.2016.107.114 · Cited by 6 · see citing works

On Comparisons of With and Without Replacement Sampling Strategies for Estimating Finite Population Mean in Randomized Response Surveys

Sengupta, S. (2015) · Sankhya B · doi:10.1007/s13571-015-0107-1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works

Estimation of Population Parameters Using the Technique of Sub-sampling from Non-respondents in Sample Surveys: A Review

Khare, B. B. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences India Section A Physical Sciences · doi:10.1007/s40010-013-0107-3 · Cited by 2 · see citing works