The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating the Helpfulness and Economic Impact of Product Reviews: Mining Text and Reviewer Characteristics
Open accessAbstract
With the rapid growth of the Internet, the ability of users to create and publish content has created active electronic communities that provide a wealth of product information. However, the high volume of reviews that are typically published for a single product makes harder for individuals as well as manufacturers to locate the best reviews and understand the true underlying quality of a product. In this paper, we reexamine the impact of reviews on economic outcomes like product sales and see how different factors affect social outcomes such as their perceived usefulness. Our approach explores multiple aspects of review text, such as subjectivity levels, various measures of readability and extent of spelling errors to identify important text-based features. In addition, we also examine multiple reviewer-level features such as average usefulness of past reviews and the self-disclosed identity measures of reviewers that are displayed next to a review. Our econometric analysis reveals that the extent of subjectivity, informativeness, readability, and linguistic correctness in reviews matters in influencing sales and perceived usefulness. Reviews that have a mixture of objective, and highly subjective sentences are negatively associated with product sales, compared to reviews that tend to include only subjective or only objective information. However, such reviews are rated more informative (or helpful) by other users. By using Random Forest-based classifiers, we show that we can accurately predict the impact of reviews on sales and their perceived usefulness. We examine the relative importance of the three broad feature categories: “reviewer-related” features, “review subjectivity” features, and “review readability” features, and find that using any of the three feature sets results in a statistically equivalent performance as in the case of using all available features. This paper is the first study that integrates econometric, text mining, and predictive modeling techniques toward a more complete analysis of the information captured by user-generated online reviews in order to estimate their helpfulness and economic impact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345 · Cited by 6,003
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.10073 · Cited by 5,916
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- Hu, Can Online Reviews Reveal a Product’s True Quality? Empirical Findings and Analytical Modeling of Online Word-of-Mouth Communication, 324
- Dellarocas, Exploring the Value of Online Product Ratings in Revenue Forecasting: The Case of Motion Pictures
- 10.1111/j.0022-1821.2005.00244.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/isre.1080.0193 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1509/jmkg.70.3.74 · doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.3.74 · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jretai.2008.04.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Hass, Effects of Source Characteristics on Cognitive Responses and Persuasion, 1
- 10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.752 · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.752 · Paper page
- Chaiken, The Heuristic Model of Persuasion, 5, 3
- 10.1086/209118 · DOI · Paper page
- Spears, Social Influence and the Influence of the ‘Social’ in Computer-Mediated Communication, 30
- 10.1287/orsc.10.6.791 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s1532785xmep0103_4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/isre.1070.0113 · DOI · Paper page
- Ghose, Opinion Mining Using Econometrics: A Case Study on Reputation Systems, 416
- 10.1145/1281192.1281202 · DOI · Paper page
- Ghose, Designing Ranking Systems for Consumer Reviews: The Impact of Review Subjectivity on Product Sales and Review Quality
- 10.1145/1282100.1282158 · DOI · Paper page
- Ghose, Estimating the Socio-Economic Impact of Product Reviews: Mining Text and Reviewer Characteristics
- 10.1145/1183614.1183626 · DOI
- 10.3115/1610075.1610135 · DOI · Paper page
- Liu, Low-Quality Product Review Detection in Opinion Summarization, 334
- 10.1145/1518701.1518848 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICDM.2008.94 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3115/1557769.1557806 · DOI
- Weimer, Predicting the Perceived Quality of Web Forum Posts
- 10.1145/1148170.1148212 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-540-68636-1_54 · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68636-1_54
- Hao, Why Some Online Product Reviews Have No Usefulness Rating?
- 10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13945 · DOI
- 10.1214/088342306000000187 · DOI
- 10.3115/976909.979640 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1014052.1014073 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3115/1220355.1220555 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3115/1073083.1073153 · DOI · Paper page
- Pang, Thumbs Up? Sentiment Classification Using Machine Learning Techniques
- 10.1145/775152.775226 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3115/1218955.1218990 · DOI · Paper page
- Cui, Comparative Experiments on Sentiment Classification for Online Product Reviews
- 10.3115/1219840.1219855 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-8640.2006.00275.x · DOI
- Nigam, Towards a Robust Metric of Opinion, 598
- Snyder, Multiple Aspect Ranking Using the Good Grief Algorithm
- White, 2003, The 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL)
- DuBay, 2004, The Principles of Readability
- Chevalier, Measuring Prices and Price Competition Online: Amazon.com and BarnesandNoble.com, 1, 203
- Wooldridge, 2001, Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
- Burges, A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition, 2, 121
- 10.29172/7c2a6982-6d72-4cd8-bba6-2fccb06a7011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1143844.1143865 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1390156.1390169 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1526709.1526729 · DOI · Paper page
- Shen, Essays on Online Reviews: The Strategic Behaviors of Online Reviewers to Compete for Attention, and the Temporal Pattern of Online Reviews
- 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.035 · DOI
- 10.1109/mis.2011.22 · DOI
- Yahia, Reviewing the Reviewers: Characterizing Biases and Competencies Using Socially Meaningful Attributes
Cited by
What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites
Liu, Z., & Park, S. (2015) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.020 · Cited by 963
What can big data and text analytics tell us about hotel guest experience and satisfaction?
Xiang, Z., Schwartz, Z., Gerdes, J. H., & Uysal, M. (2015) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.10.013 · Cited by 953
Uniting the Tribes: Using Text for Marketing Insight
Berger, J., Humphreys, A., Ludwig, S., Moe, W. W., Netzer, O., & Schweidel, D. A. (2020) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242919873106 · Cited by 742
Ghose, A., Ipeirotis, P. G., & Li, B. (2012) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1110.0700 · Cited by 649
Self-citationSpinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement
Henisz, W. J., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. J. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2180 · Cited by 546
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1498-1512
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098173428
- Cited by
- 1,400
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 127.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating the Helpfulness and Economic Impact of Product Reviews: Mining Text and Reviewer Characteristics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2010.188
- The paper
- Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2011). Estimating the Helpfulness and Economic Impact of Product Reviews: Mining Text and Reviewer Characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2010.188
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.