Cited by 1,143Knowledge Management and SharingExpert finding and Q&A systemsPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities

Ma, Meng, Agarwal, Ritu·2007·Information Systems Research

Abstract

A variety of information technology (IT) artifacts, such as those supporting reputation management and digital archives of past interactions, are commonly deployed to support online communities. Despite their ubiquity, theoretical and empirical research investigating the impact of such IT-based features on online community communication and interaction is limited. Drawing on the social psychology literature, we describe an identity-based view to understand how the use of IT-based features in online communities is associated with online knowledge contribution. Specifically, the use of four categories of IT artifacts—those supporting virtual co-presence, persistent labeling, self-presentation, and deep profiling—is proposed to enhance perceived identity verification, which thereafter promotes satisfaction and knowledge contribution. To test the theoretical model, we surveyed more than 650 members of two online communities. In addition to the positive effects of community IT artifacts on perceived identity verification, we also find that perceived identity verification is strongly linked to member satisfaction and knowledge contribution. This paper offers a new perspective on the mechanisms through which IT features facilitate computer-mediated knowledge sharing, and it yields important implications for the design of the supporting IT infrastructure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/isre.1070.0113

Cites

165 of 165 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, M., & Agarwal, R.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Information Systems Research
Published
2007-03
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
42-67
ISSN
  • 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5536
OpenAlex
W2165117260
Cited by
1,143
References
165
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 90 · 2013: 91 · 2012: 75
FWCI
191.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Expert finding and Q&A systems
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
online communities, identity verification, knowledge contribution, information technology design, reputation management, virtual co-presence, self-presentation, member satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review