Cited by 160Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningSpeech and dialogue systemsSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Architecture for Building Conversational Agents That Support Collaborative Learning

Kumar, R, Rosé, Carolyn P·2011·IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies

Abstract

Tutorial Dialog Systems that employ Conversational Agents (CAs) to deliver instructional content to learners in one-on-one tutoring settings have been shown to be effective in multiple learning domains by multiple research groups. Our work focuses on extending this successful learning technology to collaborative learning settings involving two or more learners interacting with one or more agents. Experience from extending existing techniques for developing conversational agents into multiple-learner settings highlights two underlying assumptions from the one-learner setting that do not generalize well to the multiuser setting, and thus cause difficulties. These assumptions include what we refer to as the near-even participation assumption and the known addressee assumption. A new software architecture called Basilica that allows us to address and overcome these limitations is a major contribution of this article. The Basilica architecture adopts an object-oriented approach to represent agents as a network composed of what we refer to as behavioral components because they enable the agents to engage in rich conversational behaviors. Additionally, we describe three specific conversational agents built using Basilica in order to illustrate the desirable properties of this new architecture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tlt.2010.41

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, R., & Rosé, C. P.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
Published
2011-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
21-34
ISSN
1939-1382 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100970477
Cited by
160
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies (publishedVersion)
Funders
CA Technologies
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
chatbots, cooperative learning, basilica architecture, software architecture, behavioral component, one-on-one tutoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review