The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Teachers Make Dashboard Information Actionable
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For instance, SR has revealed the pedagogical knowledge base related to the use of dashboards and the provision of feedback by novice teachers (Karimi and Norouzi, 2017;Molenaar and Knoop-van Campen, 2018;Yu, 2021).”
From A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022 (2024) · cites this paper as Molenaar and Knoop-van Campen, 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/353485.353487 · Cited by 2,300
Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.038 · Cited by 449
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- roelofs, 2007, Towards a framework for assessing teacher competence, European Journal of Vocational Training, 40, 123
- 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02073.x · DOI
- 10.1145/2883851.2883892 · DOI
- elo, 1978, The Rating of Chess Players Past and Present
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
- van leeuwen, 2017, Teacher regulation of collaborative learning: research directions for learning analytics dashboards, Making Difference Prioritizing Equity Access CSCL, 2, 805
- 10.18608/jla.2014.12.4 · DOI
- fullan, 2004, Systems thinkers in action, Innovation UK London DfES with NCSL
- aleven, 2016, Instruction based on adaptive learning technologies, Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction
- 10.1177/0002764213479363 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9781139049580.004 · DOI
- park, 2003, Adaptive instructional systems, Educ Technol Res Develop, 25, 651
- papamitsou, 2014, Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence, J Educ Technol Soc, 17, 49
- 10.1007/978-3-658-13809-7_5 · DOI
Cited by
Towards hybrid human‐AI learning technologies
Molenaar, I. (2022) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12527 · Cited by 348
Self-citationThe TA Framework: Designing Real-time Teaching Augmentation for K-12 Classrooms
An, P., Holstein, K., d'Anjou, B., Eggen, B., & Bakker, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376277 · Cited by 69
“eacher education , AI in [58, 111, 112] education [40, 55, 125, 141], and the learning sciences [71, 122]. Their designs take various forms (e.g., see Figure 4), such as dashboard interfaces (e.g., ) [88, 90, 92, 126] peripheral information displays (e.g., [4, 7, 13, 69, 89]), or wearables (e.g., [19, 55, 58, 103]). T…”
BackgroundResultThe equalizing effect of teacher dashboards on feedback in K-12 classrooms
Knoop-van Campen, C. A. N., Wise, A., & Molenaar, I. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1931346 · Cited by 58
Self-citationA systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Wang, M., Tsai, C.-C., Liang, J.-C., & Spector, J. M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02987-6 · Cited by 47
Pozdniakov, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Tsai, Y.-S., Echeverria, V., Srivastava, N., & Gasevic, D. (2023) · LAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference · doi:10.1145/3576050.3576063 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Molenaar, I., & Knoop-van Campen, C. A. N.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
- Published
- 2019-07-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 347-355
- ISSN
- 1939-1382
- 2372-0050
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 3
- Licence
- Funders
- Kennisnet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
