Cited by 348Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Towards hybrid human‐AI learning technologies

Open access
Molenaar, Inge·2022·European Journal of Education

Abstract

Education is a unique area for application of artificial intelligence (AI). In this article, the augmentation perspective and the concept of hybrid intelligence are introduced to frame our thinking about AI in education. The involvement of quadruple helix stakeholders (i.e., researchers, education professionals, entrepreneurs, and policymakers) is necessary to understand the opportunities and challenges of different educational use cases from an integrated point of view. To facilitate a meaningful dialogue, a common language about AI in education is needed. This article outlines elements of such a common language. The detect‐diagnose‐act framework is used to describe the core functions of AI in education. The six levels of automation model is introduced to develop our thinking about the roles of AI, learners, and teachers in educational arrangements. In this model, the transition of control between teacher and technology is articulated at different levels and related to the augmentation perspective. Finally, the future of AI in education is discussed using self‐regulated learning as an example. The proposed common language will help to support a coordinated development of an interdisciplinary dialogue between quadruple helix stakeholders to strengthen meaningful application of AI for learning and teaching.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ejed.12527

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GenAI can ease the burden of developing high-quality materials by creating diverse and engaging content.

    “GenAI promises to ease this burden by creating diverse and engaging content, fostering curriculum innovation and enhancing learning experiences.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molenaar, I.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Molenaar, Inge
Venue
European Journal of Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-09-23
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
632-645
ISSN
  • 0141-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3435
OpenAlex
W4297183894
Cited by
348
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 173 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 1
FWCI
43.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, hybrid intelligence, quadruple helix, stakeholder dialogue, student self-regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review