Cited by 449Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline and Blended Learning

In search for the most informative data for feedback generation: Learning analytics in a data-rich context

Tempelaar, Dirk T., Rienties, Bart, Giesbers, Bas·2015·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.038

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • The Open University (GB)
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Tempelaar, Dirk T.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
47
Pages
157-167
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994211543
Cited by
449
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1
FWCI
44.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Dutch SURF
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
learning analytics, learning dispositions, formative assessment, virtual learning environments, student performance prediction, underachieving students, blended learning, problem-based learning, e-tutorials, feedback generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review