The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preparation of dilution-stable aqueous magnetic fluids
Abstract
As part of its program in advancing mineral technology, the Bureau of Mines, U.S. Department of the Interior, has investigated the production of water-base magnetic fluids that are stable toward dilution, and therefore fit for mineral and material beneficiation. Extension of the Bureau developed peptization technique for kerosine-base magnetic fluids to the preparation of the aqueous variety was possible when oleic acid was replaced by dodecylamine. The fluids thus prepared were, however, not stable toward dilution. Irreversible flocculation followed the addition of excessive quantities of water, such as would be encountered in mineral beneficiation operations. When dodecanoic (lauric) acid was used instead of dodecylamine as the dispersing agent, the resulting aqueous magnetic fluid was found to be more stable toward dilution with water. In this second generation water-base magnetic fluid, the dodecanate anionic dispersing agent is superior to the commonly used dodecylamine cationic dispersing agent. Chemisorption of dodecanate anion on the magnetite surface proper by chemically bonding to surface iron atoms is contrasted to the mere adsorption of a cationic surfactant on the solution side of the electric double layer. Expansion of the double layer by dilution and the accompanying decrease in dodecylamine bulk concentration can detach the cationic dispersing agent from the particles of old generation magnetic fluids and nullify their electrostatic charge. By contrast, the firmly held anionic dispersing agent will continue to adhere to the magnetic particles while augmenting their electrostatic charge. Thus, while the former fluids may irreversibly flocculate, the new generation fluids will resist flocculation upon dilution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laurent, S., Forge, D., Port, M., Roch, A., Robic, C., Vander Elst, L., & Muller, R. N. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068445e · Cited by 6,852
Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides: A review
Hua, M., Zhang, S., Pan, B., Zhang, W., Lv, L., & Zhang, Q. (2012) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.016 · Cited by 2,193
Magnetite Nanoparticle Dispersions Stabilized with Triblock Copolymers
Harris, L. A., Goff, J. D., Carmichael, A. Y., Riffle, J. S., Harburn, J. J., St. Pierre, T. G., & Saunders, M. (2003) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm020994n · Cited by 401
Tietze, R., Lyer, S., Dürr, S., Struffert, T., Engelhorn, T., Schwarz, M., Eckert, E., Göen, T., Vasylyev, S., Peukert, W., et al. (2013) · Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.nano.2013.05.001 · Cited by 232
Theranostic USPIO‐Loaded Microbubbles for Mediating and Monitoring Blood‐Brain Barrier Permeation
Lammers, T., Koczera, P., Fokong, S., Gremse, F., Ehling, J., Vogt, M., Pich, A., Storm, G., van Zandvoort, M., & Kiessling, F. (2015) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201401199 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Khalafalla, S., & Reimers, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
- Published
- 1980-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 178-183
- ISSN
- 0018-9464 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983539517
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preparation of dilution-stable aqueous magnetic fluids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmag.1980.1060578
- The paper
- Khalafalla, S., & Reimers, G. (1980). Preparation of dilution-stable aqueous magnetic fluids. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.1980.1060578
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.