The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Model-based fault diagnosis in electric drives using machine learning
Abstract
Electric motor and power electronics-based inverter are the major components in industrial and automotive electric drives. In this paper, we present a model-based fault diagnostics system developed using a machine learning technology for detecting and locating multiple classes of faults in an electric drive. Power electronics inverter can be considered to be the weakest link in such a system from hardware failure point of view; hence, this work is focused on detecting faults and finding which switches in the inverter cause the faults. A simulation model has been developed based on the theoretical foundations of electric drives to simulate the normal condition, all single-switch and post-short-circuit faults. A machine learning algorithm has been developed to automatically select a set of representative operating points in the (torque, speed) domain, which in turn is sent to the simulated electric drive model to generate signals for the training of a diagnostic neural network, fault diagnostic neural network (FDNN). We validated the capability of the FDNN on data generated by an experimental bench setup. Our research demonstrates that with a robust machine learning approach, a diagnostic system can be trained based on a simulated electric drive model, which can lead to a correct classification of faults over a wide operating domain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Cited by
Fault Description Based Attribute Transfer for Zero-Sample Industrial Fault Diagnosis
Feng, L., & Zhao, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2020.2988208 · Cited by 395
Open-Transistor Fault Diagnostics in Voltage-Source Inverters by Analyzing the Load Currents
Sleszynski, W., Nieznanski, J., & Cichowski, A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2009.2023640 · Cited by 300
Fault Diagnosis and Reconfiguration for Multilevel Inverter Drive Using AI-Based Techniques
Khomfoi, S., & Tolbert, L. M. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2007.906994 · Cited by 284
Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Based Fast and Accurate Inductor Modeling and Design
Guillod, T., Papamanolis, P., & W. Kolar, J. (2020) · IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/ojpel.2020.3012777 · Cited by 264
Model-Based Fault Detection and Identification for Switching Power Converters
Poon, J., Jain, P., Konstantakopoulos, I. C., Spanos, C., Panda, S. K., & Sanders, S. R. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2016.2541342 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphey, Y. L., Masrur, M. A., Chen, Z., & Zhang, B.
- Venue
- IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 290-303
- ISSN
- 1083-4435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153799932
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model-based fault diagnosis in electric drives using machine learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmech.2006.875568
- The paper
- Murphey, Y. L., Masrur, M. A., Chen, Z., & Zhang, B. (2006). Model-based fault diagnosis in electric drives using machine learning. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmech.2006.875568
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.