The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3-D active appearance models: segmentation of cardiac MR and ultrasound images
Abstract
A model-based method for three-dimensional image segmentation was developed and its performance assessed in segmentation of volumetric cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) images and echocardiographic temporal image sequences. Comprehensive design of a three-dimensional (3-D) active appearance model (AAM) is reported for the first time as an involved extension of the AAM framework introduced by Cootes et al. The model's behavior is learned from manually traced segmentation examples during an automated training stage. Information about shape and image appearance of the cardiac structures is contained in a single model. This ensures a spatially and/or temporally consistent segmentation of three-dimensional cardiac images. The clinical potential of the 3-D AAM is demonstrated in short-axis cardiac MR images and four-chamber echocardiographic sequences. The method's performance was assessed by comparison with manually identified independent standards in 56 clinical MR and 64 clinical echo image sequences. The AAM method showed good agreement with the independent standard using quantitative indexes of border positioning errors, endo- and epicardial volumes, and left ventricular mass. In MR, the endocardial volumes, epicardial volumes, and left ventricular wall mass correlation coefficients between manual and AAM were R2 = 0.94, 0.97, 0.82, respectively. For echocardiographic analysis, the area correlation was R2 = 0.79. The AAM method shows high promise for successful application to MR and echocardiographic image analysis in a clinical setting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cootes, T. F., Edwards, G. J., & Taylor, C. J. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.927467 · Cited by 5,409
Cited by
Bernard, O., Lalande, A., Zotti, C., Cervenansky, F., Yang, X., Heng, P.-A., Cetin, I., Lekadir, K., Camara, O., Gonzalez Ballester, M. A., et al. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2837502 · Cited by 2,431
Ultrasound image segmentation: a survey
Noble, J. A., & Boukerroui, D. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2006.877092 · Cited by 1,157
Three-dimensional cardiac computational modelling: methods, features and applications.
Lopez-Perez, A., Sebastian, R., & Ferrero, J. M. (2015) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/s12938-015-0033-5 · Cited by 151
Marginal space deep learning: efficient architecture for volumetric image parsing
Ghesu, F. C., Krubasik, E., Georgescu, B., Singh, V., Zheng, Y., Hornegger, J., & Comaniciu, D. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2538802 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitchell, S. C., Bosch, J. G., Lelieveldt, B. P. F., van der Geest, R. J., Reiber, J. H. C., & Sonka, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1167-1178
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032051785
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3-D active appearance models: segmentation of cardiac MR and ultrasound images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2002.804425
- The paper
- Mitchell, S. C., Bosch, J. G., Lelieveldt, B. P. F., van der Geest, R. J., Reiber, J. H. C., & Sonka, M. (2002). 3-D active appearance models: segmentation of cardiac MR and ultrasound images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2002.804425
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.