The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new accurate and precise 3-D segmentation method for skeletal structures in volumetric CT data
Abstract
We developed a highly automated three-dimensionally based method for the segmentation of bone in volumetric computed tomography (CT) datasets. The multistep approach starts with three-dimensional (3-D) region-growing using local adaptive thresholds followed by procedures to correct for remaining boundary discontinuities and a subsequent anatomically oriented boundary adjustment using local values of cortical bone density. We describe the details of our approach and show applications in the proximal femur, the knee, and the skull. The accuracy of the determination of geometrical parameters was analyzed using CT scans of the semi-anthropomorphic European spine phantom. Depending on the settings of the segmentation parameters cortical thickness could be determined with an accuracy corresponding to the side length of 1 to 2.5 voxels. The impact of noise on the segmentation was investigated by artificially adding noise to the CT data. An increase in noise by factors of two and five changed cortical thickness corresponding to the side length of one voxel. Intraoperator and interoperator precision was analyzed by repeated analysis of nine pelvic CT scans. Precision errors were smaller than 1% for trabecular and total volumes and smaller than 2% for cortical thickness. Intraoperator and interoperator precision errors were not significantly different. Our segmentation approach shows: 1) high accuracy and precision and is 2) robust to noise, 3) insensitive to user-defined thresholds, 4) highly automated and fast, and 5) easy to initialize.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kalender, W. A., Felsenberg, D., Genant, H. K., Fischer, M., Dequeker, J., & Reeve, J. (1995) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/0720-048x(95)00631-y · Cited by 263
Self-citation
Cited by
Engelke, K., Adams, J. E., Armbrecht, G., Augat, P., Bogado, C. E., Bouxsein, M. L., Felsenberg, D., Ito, M., Prevrhal, S., Hans, D. B., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Densitometry · doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.010 · Cited by 617
Self-citationBone geometry and skeletal fragility
Bouxsein, M. L., & Karasik, D. (2006) · Current Osteoporosis Reports · doi:10.1007/s11914-006-0002-9 · Cited by 165
Ng, K. C. G., Lamontagne, M., Labrosse, M. R., & Beaulé, P. E. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147813 · Cited by 54
Li, W., Kezele, I., Collins, D. L., Zijdenbos, A., Keyak, J., Kornak, J., Koyama, A., Saeed, I., LeBlanc, A., Harris, T., et al. (2007) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2007.07.006 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Kang, Y., Engelke, K., & Kalender, W. A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 586-598
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108824264
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.