The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic detection of red lesions in digital color fundus photographs
Abstract
The robust detection of red lesions in digital color fundus photographs is a critical step in the development of automated screening systems for diabetic retinopathy. In this paper, a novel red lesion detection method is presented based on a hybrid approach, combining prior works by Spencer et al. (1996) and Frame et al. (1998) with two important new contributions. The first contribution is a new red lesion candidate detection system based on pixel classification. Using this technique, vasculature and red lesions are separated from the background of the image. After removal of the connected vasculature the remaining objects are considered possible red lesions. Second, an extensive number of new features are added to those proposed by Spencer-Frame. The detected candidate objects are classified using all features and a k-nearest neighbor classifier. An extensive evaluation was performed on a test set composed of images representative of those normally found in a screening set. When determining whether an image contains red lesions the system achieves a sensitivity of 100% at a specificity of 87%. The method is compared with several different automatic systems and is shown to outperform them all. Performance is close to that of a human expert examining the images for the presence of red lesions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ridge-based vessel segmentation in color images of the retina
Staal, J., Abramoff, M. D., Niemeijer, M., Viergever, M. A., & van Ginneken, B. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.825627 · Cited by 4,202
Self-citation
Cited by
Abràmoff, M. D., Lavin, P. T., Birch, M., Shah, N., & Folk, J. C. (2018) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0040-6 · Cited by 1,638
Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology
Ting, D. S. W., Pasquale, L. R., Peng, L., Campbell, J. P., Lee, A. Y., Raman, R., Tan, G. S. W., Schmetterer, L., Keane, P. A., & Wong, T. Y. (2019) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313173 · Cited by 1,554
the DIARETDB1 diabetic retinopathy database and evaluation protocol
Kauppi, T., Kalesnykiene, V., Kamarainen, J.-K., Lensu, L., Sorri, I., Raninen, A., Voutilainen, R., Uusitalo, H., Kalviainen, H., & Pietila, J. (2007) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2007 · doi:10.5244/c.21.15 · Cited by 854
van Grinsven, M. J. J. P., van Ginneken, B., Hoyng, C. B., Theelen, T., & Sanchez, C. I. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2526689 · Cited by 426
Giger, M. L., Chan, H., & Boone, J. (2008) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3013555 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Niemeijer, M., van Ginneken, B., Staal, J., Suttorp-Schulten, M. S. A., & Abramoff, M. D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 584-592
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982761740
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic detection of red lesions in digital color fundus photographs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2005.843738
- The paper
- Niemeijer, M., van Ginneken, B., Staal, J., Suttorp-Schulten, M. S. A., & Abramoff, M. D. (2005). Automatic detection of red lesions in digital color fundus photographs. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2005.843738
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.