The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical DT-MRI Estimation, Smoothing, and Fiber Tracking With Log-Euclidean Metrics
Abstract
Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DT-MRI or DTI) is an imaging modality that is gaining importance in clinical applications. However, in a clinical environment, data have to be acquired rapidly, often at the expense of the image quality. This often results in DTI datasets that are not suitable for complex postprocessing like fiber tracking. We propose a new variational framework to improve the estimation of DT-MRI in this clinical context. Most of the existing estimation methods rely on a log-Gaussian noise (Gaussian noise on the image logarithms), or a Gaussian noise, that do not reflect the Rician nature of the noise in MR images with a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). With these methods, the Rician noise induces a shrinking effect: the tensor volume is underestimated when other noise models are used for the estimation. In this paper, we propose a maximum likelihood strategy that fully exploits the assumption of a Rician noise. To further reduce the influence of the noise, we optimally exploit the spatial correlation by coupling the estimation with an anisotropic prior previously proposed on the spatial regularity of the tensor field itself, which results in a maximum a posteriori estimation. Optimizing such a nonlinear criterion requires adapted tools for tensor computing. We show that Riemannian metrics for tensors, and more specifically the log-Euclidean metrics, are a good candidate and that this criterion can be efficiently optimized. Experiments on synthetic data show that our method correctly handles the shrinking effect even with very low SNR, and that the positive definiteness of tensors is always ensured. Results on real clinical data demonstrate the truthfulness of the proposed approach and show promising improvements of fiber tracking in the brain and the spinal cord.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Turken, A. U., & Dronkers, N. F. (2011) · Frontiers in System Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2011.00001 · Cited by 1,012
Geometric Means in a Novel Vector Space Structure on Symmetric Positive‐Definite Matrices
Arsigny, V., Fillard, P., Pennec, X., & Ayache, N. (2007) · SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1137/050637996 · Cited by 819
Self-citationDiffusion MRI fiber tractography of the brain
Jeurissen, B., Descoteaux, M., Mori, S., & Leemans, A. (2019) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.3785 · Cited by 574
Diffusion Weighted Image Denoising Using Overcomplete Local PCA
Manjón, J. V., Coupé, P., Concha, L., Buades, A., Collins, D. L., & Robles, M. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073021 · Cited by 417
Wiest-Daesslé, N., Prima, S., Coupé, P., Morrissey, S. P., & Barillot, C. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85990-1_21 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Fillard, P., Pennec, X., Arsigny, V., & Ayache, N.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1472-1482
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026366832
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical DT-MRI Estimation, Smoothing, and Fiber Tracking With Log-Euclidean Metrics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2007.899173
- The paper
- Fillard, P., Pennec, X., Arsigny, V., & Ayache, N. (2007). Clinical DT-MRI Estimation, Smoothing, and Fiber Tracking With Log-Euclidean Metrics. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2007.899173
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.