Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 249

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clinical DT-MRI Estimation, Smoothing, and Fiber Tracking With Log-Euclidean Metrics

Fillard, P., Pennec, X., Arsigny, V., Ayache, N.·2007·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DT-MRI or DTI) is an imaging modality that is gaining importance in clinical applications. However, in a clinical environment, data have to be acquired rapidly, often at the expense of the image quality. This often results in DTI datasets that are not suitable for complex postprocessing like fiber tracking. We propose a new variational framework to improve the estimation of DT-MRI in this clinical context. Most of the existing estimation methods rely on a log-Gaussian noise (Gaussian noise on the image logarithms), or a Gaussian noise, that do not reflect the Rician nature of the noise in MR images with a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). With these methods, the Rician noise induces a shrinking effect: the tensor volume is underestimated when other noise models are used for the estimation. In this paper, we propose a maximum likelihood strategy that fully exploits the assumption of a Rician noise. To further reduce the influence of the noise, we optimally exploit the spatial correlation by coupling the estimation with an anisotropic prior previously proposed on the spatial regularity of the tensor field itself, which results in a maximum a posteriori estimation. Optimizing such a nonlinear criterion requires adapted tools for tensor computing. We show that Riemannian metrics for tensors, and more specifically the log-Euclidean metrics, are a good candidate and that this criterion can be efficiently optimized. Experiments on synthetic data show that our method correctly handles the shrinking effect even with very low SNR, and that the positive definiteness of tensors is always ensured. Results on real clinical data demonstrate the truthfulness of the proposed approach and show promising improvements of fiber tracking in the brain and the spinal cord.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmi.2007.899173

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 249

Metadata

Authors
Fillard, P., Pennec, X., Arsigny, V., & Ayache, N.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2007-11
Volume
26
Issue
11
Pages
1472-1482
ISSN
0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026366832
Cited by
249
References
0
FWCI
18.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical DT-MRI Estimation, Smoothing, and Fiber Tracking With Log-Euclidean Metrics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2007.899173
The paper
Fillard, P., Pennec, X., Arsigny, V., & Ayache, N. (2007). Clinical DT-MRI Estimation, Smoothing, and Fiber Tracking With Log-Euclidean Metrics. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2007.899173

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.