The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intraretinal Layer Segmentation of Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Images Using Optimal 3-D Graph Search
Open accessAbstract
Current techniques for segmenting macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) images have been 2-D in nature. Furthermore, commercially available OCT systems have only focused on segmenting a single layer of the retina, even though each intraretinal layer may be affected differently by disease. We report an automated approach for segmenting (anisotropic) 3-D macular OCT scans into five layers. Each macular OCT dataset consisted of six linear radial scans centered at the fovea. The six surfaces defining the five layers were identified on each 3-D composite image by transforming the segmentation task into that of finding a minimum-cost closed set in a geometric graph constructed from edge/regional information and a priori determined surface smoothness and interaction constraints. The method was applied to the macular OCT scans of 12 patients (24 3-D composite image datasets) with unilateral anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION). Using the average of three experts' tracings as a reference standard resulted in an overall mean unsigned border positioning error of 6.1 +/- 2.9 microm, a result comparable to the interobserver variability (6.9 +/- 3.3 microm). Our quantitative analysis of the automated segmentation results from AION subject data revealed that the inner retinal layer thickness for the affected eye was 24.1 microm (21%) smaller on average than for the unaffected eye (p < 0.001), supporting the need for segmenting the layers separately.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information
Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., Marchal, G., & Suetens, P. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.563664 · Cited by 4,547
Cited by
Retinal Imaging and Image Analysis
Abramoff, M. D., Garvin, M. K., & Sonka, M. (2010) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2010.2084567 · Cited by 1,439
Self-citationA paradigm shift in imaging biomarkers in neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Schmidt-Erfurth, U., & Waldstein, S. M. (2016) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.007 · Cited by 390
Early Neurodegeneration in the Retina of Type 2 Diabetic Patients
van Dijk, H. W., Verbraak, F. D., Kok, P. H. B., Stehouwer, M., Garvin, M. K., Sonka, M., DeVries, J. H., Schlingemann, R. O., & Abràmoff, M. D. (2012) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8997 · Cited by 358
Self-citationRetinal layer segmentation of macular OCT images using boundary classification
Lang, A., Carass, A., Hauser, M., Sotirchos, E. S., Calabresi, P. A., Ying, H. S., & Prince, J. L. (2013) · Biomedical Optics Express · doi:10.1364/boe.4.001133 · Cited by 310
Structured layer surface segmentation for retina OCT using fully convolutional regression networks
He, Y., Carass, A., Liu, Y., Jedynak, B. M., Solomon, S. D., Saidha, S., Calabresi, P. A., & Prince, J. L. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101856 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Garvin, M. K., Abramoff, M. D., Kardon, R., Russell, S. R., Wu, X., & Sonka, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1495-1505
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2138157582
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraretinal Layer Segmentation of Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Images Using Optimal 3-D Graph Search. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2008.923966
- The paper
- Garvin, M. K., Abramoff, M. D., Kardon, R., Russell, S. R., Wu, X., & Sonka, M. (2008). Intraretinal Layer Segmentation of Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Images Using Optimal 3-D Graph Search. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2008.923966
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.