The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Automated 3-D Intraretinal Layer Segmentation of Macular Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Images
Open accessAbstract
With the introduction of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), much larger image datasets are routinely acquired compared to what was possible using the previous generation of time-domain OCT. Thus, the need for 3-D segmentation methods for processing such data is becoming increasingly important. We report a graph-theoretic segmentation method for the simultaneous segmentation of multiple 3-D surfaces that is guaranteed to be optimal with respect to the cost function and that is directly applicable to the segmentation of 3-D spectral OCT image data. We present two extensions to the general layered graph segmentation method: the ability to incorporate varying feasibility constraints and the ability to incorporate true regional information. Appropriate feasibility constraints and cost functions were learned from a training set of 13 spectral-domain OCT images from 13 subjects. After training, our approach was tested on a test set of 28 images from 14 subjects. An overall mean unsigned border positioning error of 5.69+/-2.41 microm was achieved when segmenting seven surfaces (six layers) and using the average of the manual tracings of two ophthalmologists as the reference standard. This result is very comparable to the measured interobserver variability of 5.71+/-1.98 microm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networks to Guide Marker Discovery
Schlegl, T., Seeböck, P., Waldstein, S. M., Schmidt-Erfurth, U., & Langs, G. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59050-9_12 · Cited by 2,627
f-AnoGAN: Fast unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks
Schlegl, T., Seeböck, P., Waldstein, S. M., Langs, G., & Schmidt-Erfurth, U. (2019) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.01.010 · Cited by 1,545
A paradigm shift in imaging biomarkers in neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Schmidt-Erfurth, U., & Waldstein, S. M. (2016) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.007 · Cited by 390
Decreased Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes
van Dijk, H. W., Verbraak, F. D., Kok, P. H. B., Garvin, M. K., Sonka, M., Lee, K., DeVries, J. H., Michels, R. P. J., van Velthoven, M. E. J., Schlingemann, R. O., et al. (2010) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.09-5041 · Cited by 359
Self-citationExploiting epistemic uncertainty of anatomy segmentation for anomaly detection in retinal OCT
Seebock, P., Orlando, J. I., Schlegl, T., Waldstein, S. M., Bogunovic, H., Klimscha, S., Langs, G., & Schmidt-Erfurth, U. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2019.2919951 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Garvin, M. K., Abramoff, M. D., Wu, X., Russell, S. R., Burns, T. L., & Sonka, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1436-1447
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2127318120
- Cited by
- 626
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated 3-D Intraretinal Layer Segmentation of Macular Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2009.2016958
- The paper
- Garvin, M. K., Abramoff, M. D., Wu, X., Russell, S. R., Burns, T. L., & Sonka, M. (2009). Automated 3-D Intraretinal Layer Segmentation of Macular Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2009.2016958
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.