Cited by 78Image and Signal Denoising MethodsMRI in cancer diagnosisImage Enhancement Techniques

Denoising of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Images Using Dynamic Nonlocal Means

Gal, Y., Mehnert, A.J.H., Bradley, A.P., McMahon, K., Kennedy, D., Crozier, S.·2010·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

This paper presents a new algorithm for denoising dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR images. It is a novel variation on the nonlocal means (NLM) algorithm. The algorithm, called dynamic nonlocal means (DNLM), exploits the redundancy of information in the temporal sequence of images. Empirical evaluations of the performance of the DNLM algorithm relative to seven other denoising methods-simple Gaussian filtering, the original NLM algorithm, a trivial extension of NLM to include the temporal dimension, bilateral filtering, anisotropic diffusion filtering, wavelet adaptive multiscale products threshold, and traditional wavelet thresholding-are presented. The evaluations include quantitative evaluations using simulated data and real data (20 DCE-MRI data sets from routine clinical breast MRI examinations) as well as qualitative evaluations using the same real data (24 observers: 14 image/signal-processing specialists, 10 clinical breast MRI radiographers). The results of the quantitative evaluation using the simulated data show that the DNLM algorithm consistently yields the smallest MSE between the denoised image and its corresponding original noiseless version. The results of the quantitative evaluation using the real data provide evidence, at the alpha = 0.05 level of significance, that the DNLM algorithm yields the smallest MSE between the denoised image and its corresponding original noiseless version. The results of the qualitative evaluation provide evidence, at the alpha = 0.05 level of significance, that the DNLM algorithm performs visually better than all of the other algorithms. Collectively the qualitative and quantitative results suggest that the DNLM algorithm more effectively attenuates noise in DCE MR images than any of the other algorithms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmi.2009.2026575

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Benou et al.'s ensemble model's qualitative and quantitative (MSE) denoising results were better than spatiotemporal Beltrami, moving average, the dynamic Non Local Means method, and stacked denoising autoencoders.

    “The qualitative and quantitative (MSE) denoising results were better than spatiotemporal Beltrami, moving average, the dynamic Non Local Means method [182], and stacked denoising autoencoders [183].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gal, Y., Mehnert, A. J. H., Bradley, A. P., McMahon, K., Kennedy, D., & Crozier, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Greenslopes Private Hospital (AU)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2010-02
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
302-310
ISSN
  • 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-254X
OpenAlex
W2099440229
Cited by
78
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
Keywords
dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, image denoising, non-local means, temporal redundancy, breast MRI, observer evaluation
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Breast, Computer Simulation, Contrast Media, Female, Humans, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Normal Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review