The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
General Retinal Vessel Segmentation Using Regularization-Based Multiconcavity Modeling
Abstract
Detecting blood vessels in retinal images with the presence of bright and dark lesions is a challenging unsolved problem. In this paper, a novel multiconcavity modeling approach is proposed to handle both healthy and unhealthy retinas simultaneously. The differentiable concavity measure is proposed to handle bright lesions in a perceptive space. The line-shape concavity measure is proposed to remove dark lesions which have an intensity structure different from the line-shaped vessels in a retina. The locally normalized concavity measure is designed to deal with unevenly distributed noise due to the spherical intensity variation in a retinal image. These concavity measures are combined together according to their statistical distributions to detect vessels in general retinal images. Very encouraging experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method consistently yields the best performance over existing state-of-the-art methods on the abnormal retinas and its accuracy outperforms the human observer, which has not been achieved by any of the state-of-the-art benchmark methods. Most importantly, unlike existing methods, the proposed method shows very attractive performances not only on healthy retinas but also on a mixture of healthy and pathological retinas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ridge-based vessel segmentation in color images of the retina
Staal, J., Abramoff, M. D., Niemeijer, M., Viergever, M. A., & van Ginneken, B. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.825627 · Cited by 4,202
Cited by
A Cross-Modality Learning Approach for Vessel Segmentation in Retinal Images
Li, Q., Feng, B., Xie, L., Liang, P., Zhang, H., & Wang, T. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2015.2457891 · Cited by 571
Transforms and Operators for Directional Bioimage Analysis: A Survey
Püspöki, Z., Storath, M., Sage, D., & Unser, M. (2016) · Advances in Anatomy, Embryology and Cell Biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28549-8_3 · Cited by 522
Odstrcilik, J., Kolar, R., Budai, A., Hornegger, J., Jan, J., Gazarek, J., Kubena, T., Cernosek, P., Svoboda, O., & Angelopoulou, E. (2013) · IET Image Processing · doi:10.1049/iet-ipr.2012.0455 · Cited by 472
Joint Segment-Level and Pixel-Wise Losses for Deep Learning Based Retinal Vessel Segmentation
Yan, Z., Yang, X., & Cheng, K.-T. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2018.2828137 · Cited by 428
Robust Retinal Vessel Segmentation via Locally Adaptive Derivative Frames in Orientation Scores
Zhang, J., Dashtbozorg, B., Bekkers, E., Pluim, J. P. W., Duits, R., & ter Haar Romeny, B. M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2587062 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Lam, B. S. Y., Gao, Y., & Liew, A. W.-C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1369-1381
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2084559491
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: General Retinal Vessel Segmentation Using Regularization-Based Multiconcavity Modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2010.2043259
- The paper
- Lam, B. S. Y., Gao, Y., & Liew, A. W.-C. (2010). General Retinal Vessel Segmentation Using Regularization-Based Multiconcavity Modeling. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2010.2043259
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.