Cited by 26Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesMedical Imaging and AnalysisOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

Automatic Inference and Measurement of 3D Carpal Bone Kinematics From Single View Fluoroscopic Sequences

Open access
Chen, Xin, Graham, Jim, Hutchinson, Charles, Muir, Lindsay·2013·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

We present a novel framework for estimating the 3D poses and shapes of the carpal bones from single view fluoroscopic sequences. A hybrid statistical model representing both the pose and shape variation of the carpal bones is built, based on a number of 3D CT data sets obtained from different subjects at different poses. Given a fluoroscopic sequence, the wrist pose, carpal bone pose and bone shapes are estimated iteratively by matching the statistical model with the 2D images. A specially designed cost function enables smoothed parameter estimation across frames and constrains local bone pose with a penalty term. We have evaluated the proposed method on both simulated data and real fluoroscopic sequences and demonstrated that the relative poses of carpal bones can be accurately estimated. One condition that may be assessed using this measurement is dissociation, where the distance between the bones is larger than normal. Scaphoid-Lunate dissociation is one of the most common of these. The error of the measured 3D Scaphoid-Lunate distances were 0.75±0.50 mm for simulated data (25 subjects) and 0.93±0.47 mm for real data (15 subjects). We also propose a method for constructing a "standard" pathology measurement tool for automatically detecting Scaphoid-Lunate dissociation conditions, based on single-view fluoroscopic sequences. For the simulated data, it produced 100% sensitivity and specificity. For the real data, it achieved 83% sensitivity and 78% specificity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmi.2012.2226740

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 2D intraoperative X-ray can be registered to a 3D preoperative CT volume by maximizing its similarity to a rendered X-ray with respect to the camera pose.

    “A 2D intraoperative X-ray can be registered to a 3D preoperative CT volume by maximizing its similarity to a rendered X-ray with respect to the camera pose [8, 14, 34].”
  • Traditional intensity-based registration methods are routinely employed to solve compound, multiple object registration problems across broad applications.

    “Despite the small number of learning-based multiple object registration strategies, traditional intensity-based registration methods are now routinely employed to solve compound, multiple object, registration problems across broad applications, such as: kinematic measurements of bone (Chen et al., 2012; Otake et al., 2016; Abe et al., 2019), rib motion and respiratory analysis (Hiasa et al., 2019)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, X., Graham, J., Hutchinson, C., & Muir, L.
Affiliations
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2013-02
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
317-328
ISSN
  • 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-254X
OpenAlex
W2036207440
Cited by
26
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Keywords
carpal bones, carpal kinematics, fluoroscopy, 3D pose estimation, shape estimation, statistical shape models, wrist
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Carpal Bones, Fluoroscopy, Movement, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Posture, Radiographic Image Enhancement, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review