The DOI matches its Crossref record; 526 of the 539 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deformable Medical Image Registration: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
Deformable image registration is a fundamental task in medical image processing. Among its most important applications, one may cite: 1) multi-modality fusion, where information acquired by different imaging devices or protocols is fused to facilitate diagnosis and treatment planning; 2) longitudinal studies, where temporal structural or anatomical changes are investigated; and 3) population modeling and statistical atlases used to study normal anatomical variability. In this paper, we attempt to give an overview of deformable registration methods, putting emphasis on the most recent advances in the domain. Additional emphasis has been given to techniques applied to medical images. In order to study image registration methods in depth, their main components are identified and studied independently. The most recent techniques are presented in a systematic fashion. The contribution of this paper is to provide an extensive account of registration techniques in a systematic manner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“deformable image registration (Sotiras et al., 2013) is a core component of all MAS methods, and the quality of individual registrations has a very high impact on the accuracy of the final segmentation.”
From MUSE: MUlti-atlas region Segmentation utilizing Ensembles of registration algorithms and parameters, and locally optimal atlas selection (2016) · cites this paper as Sotiras et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Optimization by Simulated Annealing
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · Cited by 45,134 · cited 1×
“metallurgy, Simulated Annealing [386] should be referenced.”
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534 · cited 1×
“tumor progression [5]), it is necessary to align longitudinal data into a common domain where comparisons are meaningful.”
BackgroundA Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes
Besl, P., & Mckay, N. D. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.121791 · Cited by 22,163 · cited 1×
“One of the most well known approaches is the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) method proposed by Besl and McKay [310].”
MethodNumerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5638 · Cited by 17,933
(1988) · Cited by 16,582
Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF)
Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2008) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014 · Cited by 13,557 · cited 2×
“Han extended the SURF descriptor [258] to and used it in a hybrid registration framework [267].”
MethodA Combined Corner and Edge Detector
Harris, C., & Stephens, M. (1988) · Procedings of the Alvey Vision Conference 1988 · doi:10.5244/c.2.23 · Cited by 12,901 · cited 1×
“proposed to identify corners by exploiting the information conveyed by the structure tensor [245].”
BackgroundA Stochastic Approximation Method
Robbins, H., & Monro, S. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729586 · Cited by 9,643 · cited 1×
“The last method was proposed by Robbins and Monro (RM) [380].”
MethodMethods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems
Hestenes, M. R., & Stiefel, E. L. (1952) · Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards · doi:10.6028/jres.049.044 · Cited by 8,142 · cited 1×
“Among the well-known formulas for β t , one may cite the Fletcher-Reeves [404], the Polak-Ribi`ere [405], the Polak-Ribi`ere-Polyak [406] and the Hestenes-Stiefel [407].”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- han, 2010, Feature-constrained nonlinear registration of lung CR images, Med Image Anal Clinic A Grand Challenge, 63
- pollak, 1969, Note sur la convergence de méthodes de directions conjuguées, Revue Franaise informatique de recherche operationnelle, 3, 35
- juan, 2009, A comparison of sift, PCA-sift and surf, Int J Image Process, 3, 143
- 10.1201/9781420042474 · DOI
- vandemeulebroucke, 2007, The popi-model, a point-validated pixel-based breathing thorax model, Int Conf Use Comput Radiat Therapy, 195
- 0, Internet brain segmentation repository
- kwon, 2011, Nonrigid image registration using higher-order MRF model with dense local descriptor, Proc Comput Vis Pattern Recognit Workshop
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep learning in medical image analysis
Shen, D., Wu, G., & Suk, H.-I. (2017) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044442 · Cited by 4,968
“Noticeably, it is very difficult to learn meaningful features given such inaccurate correspondences derived from imperfect image registration, as suffered by many supervised learning methods (79, 80, 81).”
BackgroundVoxelMorph: A Learning Framework for Deformable Medical Image Registration
Balakrishnan, G., Zhao, A., Sabuncu, M. R., Guttag, J. V., & Dalca, A. V. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2019.2897538 · Cited by 2,334
“Most existing deformable registration algorithms iteratively optimize a transformation based on an energy function [7].”
An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI
Lundervold, A. S., & Lundervold, A. (2019) · Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik · doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.11.002 · Cited by 2,058
“on correction, real-time MR physics is also an important part of the picture [224, 225]. A wide range of methodological approaches have been developed and tested for various organs and applications40 [229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238], including \previous generation" articial neural networks [239]…”
MethodInfluentialInfrared and visible image fusion methods and applications: A survey
Ma, J., Ma, Y., & Li, C. (2018) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.02.004 · Cited by 1,800
Image Matching from Handcrafted to Deep Features: A Survey
Ma, J.-Y., Jiang, X., Fan, A., Jiang, J., & Yan, J. (2020) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-020-01359-2 · Cited by 977
“Please refer to Zitova and Flusser (2003), Dawn et al. (2010), Sotiras et al. (2013) and Ferrante and Paragios (2017) for representative literature and further details.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Sotiras, A., Davatzikos, C., & Paragios, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1153-1190
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- PMC
- PMC3745275
- OpenAlex
- W2115167851
- Cited by
- 1,587
- References
- 539
- Citations by year
- 2026: 81 · 2025: 121 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 136 · 2019: 126 · 2018: 152 · 2017: 153 · 2016: 130 · 2015: 123 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 9
- FWCI
- 18.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG014971)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH070365)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
- Keywords
- deformable image registration, medical image registration, multimodal image fusion, statistical atlas, population models, anatomical variation
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
