Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiple Resolution Residually Connected Feature Streams for Automatic Lung Tumor Segmentation From CT Images

Open access
Jiang, Jue, Hu, Yu-Chi, Liu, Chia-Ju, Halpenny, Darragh, Hellmann, Matthew D., Deasy, Joseph O., Mageras, Gig, Veeraraghavan, Harini·2019·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

Volumetric lung tumor segmentation and accurate longitudinal tracking of tumor volume changes from computed tomography images are essential for monitoring tumor response to therapy. Hence, we developed two multiple resolution residually connected network (MRRN) formulations called incremental-MRRN and dense-MRRN. Our networks simultaneously combine features across multiple image resolution and feature levels through residual connections to detect and segment the lung tumors. We evaluated our method on a total of 1210 non-small cell (NSCLC) lung tumors and nodules from three data sets consisting of 377 tumors from the open-source Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA), 304 advanced stage NSCLC treated with anti- PD-1 checkpoint immunotherapy from internal institution MSKCC data set, and 529 lung nodules from the Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC). The algorithm was trained using 377 tumors from the TCIA data set and validated on the MSKCC and tested on LIDC data sets. The segmentation accuracy compared to expert delineations was evaluated by computing the dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distances, sensitivity, and precision metrics. Our best performing incremental-MRRN method produced the highest DSC of 0.74 ± 0.13 for TCIA, 0.75±0.12 for MSKCC, and 0.68±0.23 for the LIDC data sets. There was no significant difference in the estimations of volumetric tumor changes computed using the incremental-MRRN method compared with the expert segmentation. In summary, we have developed a multi-scale CNN approach for volumetrically segmenting lung tumors which enables accurate, automated identification of and serial measurement of tumor volumes in the lung.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmi.2018.2857800

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Jiang, J., Hu, Y.-C., Liu, C.-J., Halpenny, D., Hellmann, M. D., Deasy, J. O., Mageras, G., & Veeraraghavan, H.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2019-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
134-144
ISSN
  • 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-254X
OpenAlex
W2883311907
Cited by
268
References
17
FWCI
11.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Resolution Residually Connected Feature Streams for Automatic Lung Tumor Segmentation From CT Images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2018.2857800
The paper
Jiang, J., Hu, Y.-C., Liu, C.-J., Halpenny, D., Hellmann, M. D., Deasy, J. O., Mageras, G., & Veeraraghavan, H. (2019). Multiple Resolution Residually Connected Feature Streams for Automatic Lung Tumor Segmentation From CT Images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2018.2857800

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.