The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-Modal Graph Learning for Disease Prediction
Abstract
Benefiting from the powerful expressive capability of graphs, graph-based approaches have been popularly applied to handle multi-modal medical data and achieved impressive performance in various biomedical applications. For disease prediction tasks, most existing graph-based methods tend to define the graph manually based on specified modality (e.g., demographic information), and then integrated other modalities to obtain the patient representation by Graph Representation Learning (GRL). However, constructing an appropriate graph in advance is not a simple matter for these methods. Meanwhile, the complex correlation between modalities is ignored. These factors inevitably yield the inadequacy of providing sufficient information about the patient's condition for a reliable diagnosis. To this end, we propose an end-to-end Multi-modal Graph Learning framework (MMGL) for disease prediction with multi-modality. To effectively exploit the rich information across multi-modality associated with the disease, modality-aware representation learning is proposed to aggregate the features of each modality by leveraging the correlation and complementarity between the modalities. Furthermore, instead of defining the graph manually, the latent graph structure is captured through an effective way of adaptive graph learning. It could be jointly optimized with the prediction model, thus revealing the intrinsic connections among samples. Our model is also applicable to the scenario of inductive learning for those unseen data. An extensive group of experiments on two disease prediction tasks demonstrates that the proposed MMGL achieves more favorable performance. The code of MMGL is available at https://github.com/SsGood/MMGL.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, nontextual data types play a crucial role in diagnosis, effective treatment planning, research, and patient care [9-11].”
From Multimodal Large Language Models in Health Care: Applications, Challenges, and Future Outlook. (2024) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Zheng et al. introduced the MMGL framework that applied modal-aware representation learning to extract the intra- and inter-modality representations and then used adaptive graph learning (AGL) to identify associations between patients in disease prediction [68].”
From Challenges in AI-driven Biomedical Multimodal Data Fusion and Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Jakubův, J., Chvalovský, K., Goertzel, Z., et al. (2023) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/lipics.itp.2023.19 · Cited by 76,648
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
(2008) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 33,051
Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks
Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.02907 · Cited by 24,853
Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs
Hamilton, W. L., Ying, R., & Leskovec, J. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.02216 · Cited by 10,639
Advances In Deep Learning On Graphs (Gsp'18 Workshop)Preprint
Defferrard, M., Bresson, X., & Vandergheynst, P. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.09375 · Cited by 7,021
Bergstra, J., Yamins, D. L. K., & Cox, D. (2013) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) · Cited by 1,853
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Veličković, Graph attention networks, 1
- Defferrard, Convolutional neural networks on graphs with fast localized spectral filtering, 3844
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transformers in medical image analysis
He, K., Chen, G., Li, Z., Rekik, I., Yin, Z., Wen, J., Gao, Y., Wang, Q., Zhang, J., & Shen, D. G. (2022) · Intelligent Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.imed.2022.07.002 · Cited by 604
Multimodal Large Language Models in Health Care: Applications, Challenges, and Future Outlook.
AlSaad, R., Abd-alrazaq, A., Boughorbel, S., Ahmed, A., Renault, M.-A., Damseh, R., & Sheikh, J. (2024) · Journal of medical Internet research · doi:10.2196/59505 · Cited by 349
“Moreover, nontextual data types play a crucial role in diagnosis, effective treatment planning, research, and patient care [9-11].”
Shaik, T., Tao, X., Li, L., Xie, H., & Velasquez, J. D. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.102040 · Cited by 228
Multimodal learning with graphs
Ektefaie, Y., Dasoulas, G., Noori, A., Farhat, M., & Zitnik, M. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00624-6 · Cited by 166
Schouten, D., Nicoletti, G., Dille, B., Chia, C., Vendittelli, P., Schuurmans, M., Litjens, G., & Khalili, N. (2025) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2025.103621 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, S., Zhu, Z., Liu, Z., Guo, Z., Liu, Y., Yang, Y., & Zhao, Y.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Jiaotong University (CN)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2207-2216
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W4221022534
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 9
- FWCI
- 12.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Science and Technology Innovation 2030—“New Generation Artificial Intelligence” (2018AAA0102100)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61976018)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- disease prediction, graph representation learning, adaptive graph learning, inductive learning, end-to-end learning, patient representation
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review