The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Circular interpretation of bijective transformations in lossless watermarking for media asset management
Abstract
The need for reversible or lossless watermarking methods has been highlighted in the literature to associate subliminal management information with losslessly processed media and to enable their authentication. The paper first analyzes the specificity and the application scope of lossless watermarking methods. It explains why early attempts to achieve reversibility are not satisfactory. They are restricted to well-chosen images, strictly lossless context and/or suffer from annoying visual artifacts. Circular interpretation of bijective transformations is proposed to implement a method that fulfills all quality and functionality requirements of lossless watermarking. Results of several bench tests demonstrate the validity of the approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Secure spread spectrum watermarking for multimedia
Cox, I. J., Kilian, J., Leighton, F. T., & Shamoon, T. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/83.650120 · Cited by 5,299
Bender, W., Gruhl, D., Morimoto, N., & Lu, A. (1996) · IBM Systems Journal · doi:10.1147/sj.353.0313 · Cited by 2,774
The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm
Rivest, R. (1992) · doi:10.17487/rfc1321 · Cited by 1,976
Watermarking digital image and video data. A state-of-the-art overview
Langelaar, G. C., Setyawan, I., & Lagendijk, R. L. (2000) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.879337 · Cited by 849
Digital watermarking for telltale tamper proofing and authentication
Kundur, D., & Hatzinakos, D. (1999) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.771070 · Cited by 531
Image watermarking for tamper detection
Fridrich, J. (2002) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.1998.723401 · Cited by 213
Reversible intraframe compression of medical images
Roos, P., Viergever, M. A., van Dijke, M. C. A., & Peters, J. H. (1988) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.14516 · Cited by 184
Assuring Ownership Rights for Digital Images
Caronni, G. (1995) · Vieweg+Teubner eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-91094-3_16 · Cited by 144
Invisible watermarking for image verification
Yeung, M. M., & Mintzer, F. C. (1998) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.482612 · Cited by 124
Secure delivery of images over open networks
Augot, D., Boucqueau, J. M., Delaigle, J.-F., et al. (1999) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.771076 · Cited by 24
Self-citation
Cited by
Reversible data hiding: Advances in the past two decades
Shi, Y.-Q., Li, X., Zhang, X., Wu, H.-T., & Ma, B. (2016) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2016.2573308 · Cited by 594
Metadata
- Authors
- De Vleeschouwer, C., Delaigle, J.-F., & Macq, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-105
- ISSN
- 1520-9210 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118085659
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 14.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circular interpretation of bijective transformations in lossless watermarking for media asset management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmm.2003.809729
- The paper
- De Vleeschouwer, C., Delaigle, J.-F., & Macq, B. (2003). Circular interpretation of bijective transformations in lossless watermarking for media asset management. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2003.809729
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
