Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self-Supervised Learning for Multimedia Recommendation

Tao, Zhulin, Liu, Xiaohao, Xia, Yewei, Wang, Xiang, Yang, Lifang, Huang, Xianglin, Chua, Tat-Seng·2023·IEEE Transactions on Multimedia

Abstract

Learning representations for multimedia content is critical for multimedia recommendation. Current representation learning methods roughly fall into two groups: (1) using the historical interactions to create ID embeddings of users and items, and (2) treating multi-modal data as the side information of items to enrich their ID embeddings. Each user-item interaction offers the supervisory signal to optimize the representation learning by the traditional supervised learning paradigm. Due to the overlook of the multi-modal patterns ($e.g.$, co-occurrence of visual, acoustic, textual features in micro-videos a user saw before, and her behavioral features) hidden in the data, these methods are insufficient to create powerful representations and obtain satisfactory recommendation accuracy. To capture multi-modal patterns in the data itself, we go beyond the supervised learning paradigm, and incorporate the idea of self-supervised learning (SSL) into multimedia recommendation. Specifically, SSL consists of two components: (1) data augmentation upon multi-modal contents, where we design three operators — feature dropout (FD), feature masking (FM), feature fine and coarse spaces (FAC) — to generate multiple views of individual items; and (2) contrastive learning, which differentiates the views of an item from the others’ to distill additional supervisory signals. Clearly, SSL enables us to explore and exhibit the underlying relations among modalities, thereby resulting in powerful representations. We denote the generic framework by Self-supervised Learning-guided Multimedia Recommendation (SLMRec). Extensive experiments are performed on three real-world datasets, showing that SLMRec achieves significant improvements over several state-of-the-art baselines like LightGCN [1], MMGCN [2]. Further analysis shows how SSL affects recommendation performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmm.2022.3187556

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Tao, Z., Liu, X., Xia, Y., Wang, X., Yang, L., Huang, X., & Chua, T.-S.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
Published
2023
Volume
25
Pages
5107-5116
ISSN
  • 1520-9210 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0077
OpenAlex
W4285288414
Cited by
259
References
44
FWCI
43.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-Supervised Learning for Multimedia Recommendation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmm.2022.3187556
The paper
Tao, Z., Liu, X., Xia, Y., Wang, X., Yang, L., Huang, X., & Chua, T.-S. (2023). Self-Supervised Learning for Multimedia Recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2022.3187556

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.