The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EPPDA: An Efficient Privacy-Preserving Data Aggregation Federated Learning Scheme
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) is a kind of privacy-awaremachine learning, in which the machine learning models are trained on the users’ side and then the model updates are transmitted to the server for aggregating. As the data owners need not upload their data, FL is a privacy-persevering machine learning model. However, FL is weak as it suffers from a reverse attack, in which an adversary can get users’ data by analyzing the user uploaded model. Motivated by this, in this paper, based on the secret sharing, we design, an efficient privacy-preserving data aggregation mechanism for FL, to resist the reverse attack, which can aggregate users’ trained models secretly without leaking the user’s model. Moreover,EPPDAhas efficient fault tolerance for the user disconnection. Even if a large number of users are disconnected when the protocol runs, EPPDA will execute normally. Analysis shows that the EPPDA can provide a sum of locally trained models to the server without leaking any single user’s model. Moreover, adversary can not get any non-public information from the communication channel.Efficiency verificationproves that the EPPDA not only protects users’ privacy but also needs fewer computing and communication resources.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While using FL, each hospital trains their model based on locally available X-ray images and only shares gradients with a global model for computation, hence ensuring privacy preservation [78].”
From Federated Learning for Privacy Preservation in Smart Healthcare Systems: A Comprehensive Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [78]
In the citing paper
“Similar results have been achieved by EPPDA [69], an efficient privacy-preserving data aggregation method for FL that, based on secret sharing to resist the reverse attack, can covertly aggregate user-trained models without disclosing the user model.”
From Handling privacy-sensitive medical data with federated learning: Challenges and future directions (2023) · cites this paper as [69]
In the citing paper
“Adopting the homomorphisms of secret sharing, it preserves user privacy and requires less computing and communication resources than alternatives as [62], and is able to provide acceptable fault tolerance in the event of user disconnection.”
From Handling privacy-sensitive medical data with federated learning: Challenges and future directions (2023) · cites this paper as [69]
Citations
Cites
New directions in cryptography
Diffie, W., & Hellman, M. (1976) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1976.1055638 · Cited by 14,713
Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data
McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. Y. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.05629 · Cited by 14,215
Shamir, A. (1979) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359168.359176 · Cited by 13,756
Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions
Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2020.2975749 · Cited by 6,210
Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning
Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H. B., Patel, S., Ramage, D., Segal, A., & Seth, K. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3133956.3133982 · Cited by 3,956
Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey
Lim, W. Y. B., Luong, N. C., Hoang, D. T., Jiao, Y., Liang, Y.-C., Yang, Q., Niyato, D., & Miao, C. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2986024 · Cited by 2,565
Using encryption for authentication in large networks of computers
Needham, R. M., & Schroeder, M. D. (1978) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359657.359659 · Cited by 2,358
Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Design
Bonawitz, K., Eichner, H., Grieskamp, W., Huba, D., Ingerman, A., Ivanov, V., Kiddon, C., Konečný, J., Mazzocchi, S., McMahan, H. B., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.01046 · Cited by 2,334
Secret key agreement by public discussion from common information
Maurer, U. M. (1993) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.256484 · Cited by 1,971
Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learning
Melis, L., Song, C., De Cristofaro, E., & Shmatikov, V. (2019) · 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2019.00029 · Cited by 1,734
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Federated Learning for Privacy Preservation in Smart Healthcare Systems: A Comprehensive Survey
Ali, M., Naeem, F., Tariq, M., & Kaddoum, G. (2023) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2022.3181823 · Cited by 366
A Survey on Intelligent Internet of Things: Applications, Security, Privacy, and Future Directions
Aouedi, O., Vu, T.-H., Sacco, A., Nguyen, D. C., Piamrat, K., Marchetto, G., & Pham, Q. (2024) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2024.3430368 · Cited by 345
Fusion of Federated Learning and Industrial Internet of Things: A survey
Boobalan, P., Ramu, S. P., Pham, Q., Dev, K., Pandya, S., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Gadekallu, T. R., & Huynh‐The, T. (2022) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109048 · Cited by 321
Self-citationCui, Q., You, X., Ni, W., Nan, G., Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Lyu, X., Ai, M., Tao, X., Feng, Z., et al. (2025) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4337-1 · Cited by 275
Xie, Q., Jiang, S., Jiang, L., Huang, Y., Zhao, Z., Khan, S., Dai, W., Liu, Z., & Wu, K. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3382875 · Cited by 222
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, J., Wang, W., Gadekallu, T. R., Cao, J., & Liu, Y.
- Affiliations
- Guilin University of Electronic Technology (CN)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering
- Published
- 2023-09-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3047-3057
- ISSN
- 2327-4697 (ISSN-L)
- 2334-329X
- OpenAlex
- W4214719528
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 35
- FWCI
- 11.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62072133, 61662016)
- Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (2018GXNSFDA281040)
- Study Abroad Program for Graduate Student of the Guilin University of Electronic Technology (GDYX2019003)
- New Generation Artificial Intelligence (2020AAA0109300)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
- Keywords
- federated learning, privacy preservation, data aggregation, secret sharing, model aggregation, fault tolerance, communication efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
