Cited by 60Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityAccess Control and TrustSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G

SILedger: A Blockchain and ABE-based Access Control for Applications in SDN-IoT Networks

Ren, Wei, Sun, Yan, Luo, Hong, Guizani, Mohsen·2021·IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management

Abstract

The Software Defined Network in Internet of Things (SDN-IoT) is enjoying growing popularity due to its flexibility, automaticity and programmability. However, there is still a lack of proper permission management on SDN-IoT applications (SIApps), especially when the SIApp’s required northbound interfaces are located in multiple heterogeneous controllers without mutual trust. Existing access control methods are usually based on centralized models, proprietary controllers, trusting conditions or manual operations. It can incur unnecessary performance degradation and poor scalability. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a SIApps’ ledger (SILedger), an open, trusted, and decentralized access control mechanism based on blockchain and attribute-based encryption (ABE). It can not only support effective authorization of SIApps in heterogeneous and untrusted SDN-IoT control domains, but also record all interactions between SIApps and resources, and thus facilitate SIApps further charging, analysis and audit. The main idea is that the SIApps are authorized using access tokens encrypted by ABE, and these tokens are seen as the currency of blockchain to be distributed. Specifically, we re-design blockchain transaction, token encryption, token initialization and token update schemes to achieve cross-domain, fine-grained and flexible SIApps’ permission management. In order to mitigate the delay and complexity problem of blockchain and ABE, we devise an access control framework that…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsm.2021.3093002

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ren, W., Sun, Y., Luo, H., & Guizani, M.
Affiliations
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • Qatar University (QA)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
Published
2021-12
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
4406-4419
ISSN
  • 1932-4537 (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-7379
OpenAlex
W3175818073
Cited by
60
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 1
FWCI
9.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management (publishedVersion)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB2100300)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61772085, 61877005)
  • BUPT Excellent Ph.D. Students Foundation (CX2019228)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
Keywords
software-defined networking, Internet of Things, access control, blockchain, attribute-based encryption, access tokens, northbound interface, fine-grained authorization, FISCO BCOS

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review