The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Controlling cellular reactive responses around neural prosthetic devices using peripheral and local intervention strategies
Abstract
While chronic use of indwelling micromachined neural prosthetic devices has great potential, the development of reactive responses around them results in a decrease in electrode function over time. Since the cellular events responsible for these responses may be anti-inflammatory in nature, we have tested the effectiveness of dexamethasone and cyclosporin A as potential drugs for developing intervention strategies following insertion of single-shank micromachined silicon devices. Peripheral injection of dexamethasone was effective in attenuating increased expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein and astrocyte hyperplasia observed during both initial- and sustained-reactive responses observed at one and six weeks post insertion, respectively. Peripheral injection of cyclosporin A had no positive effect. If anything, application of this drug increased the early reactive response. Effectiveness of local release of dexamethasone in rat neocortex was tested by inserting ribbons of poly (ethyl-vinyl) acetate containing 35% (w/w) dexamethasone. Initial concentrations of dexamethasone were similar to those obtained by peripheral injection. Local drug release provided continued control of cellular reactive responses during the six-week study period. These results demonstrate that peripheral delivery of dexamethasone can be used to control reactive responses and that local drug delivery by slow-release from biocompatible polymers may be a more effective method of drug intervention. Incorporating these strategies on micromachined devices may provide an intervention strategy that will insure the chronic functioning of electrodes on intracortical neuroprosthetic devices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes
Polikov, V. S., Tresco, P. A., & Reichert, W. M. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.08.015 · Cited by 1,896
Yang, J. C., Mun, J., Kwon, S. Y., Park, S., Bao, Z., & Park, S. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201904765 · Cited by 1,641
Brain-Controlled Interfaces: Movement Restoration with Neural Prosthetics
Schwartz, A. B., Cui, X. T., Weber, D. J., & Moran, D. W. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.019 · Cited by 792
Wireless Implantable Microsystems: High-Density Electronic Interfaces to the Nervous System
Wise, K. D., Anderson, D. J., Hetke, J. F., Kipke, D. R., & Najafi, K. (2004) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2003.820544 · Cited by 656
Brain Tissue Responses to Neural Implants Impact Signal Sensitivity and Intervention Strategies
Kozai, T. D. Y., Jaquins-Gerstl, A. S., Vazquez, A. L., Michael, A. C., & Cui, X. T. (2015) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/cn500256e · Cited by 622
Metadata
- Authors
- Shain, W., Spataro, L., Dilgen, J., Haverstick, K., Retterer, S., Isaacson, M., Saltzman, M., & Turner, J. N.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 186-188
- ISSN
- 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0210
- OpenAlex
- W2136167005
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controlling cellular reactive responses around neural prosthetic devices using peripheral and local intervention strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnsre.2003.814800
- The paper
- Shain, W., Spataro, L., Dilgen, J., Haverstick, K., Retterer, S., Isaacson, M., Saltzman, M., & Turner, J. N. (2003). Controlling cellular reactive responses around neural prosthetic devices using peripheral and local intervention strategies. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2003.814800
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.