Cited by 227Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionGait Recognition and Analysis

Portable preimpact fall detector with inertial sensors

Wu, Ge, Xue, Shuwan·2008·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

Falls and the resulting hip fractures in the elderly are a major health and economic problem. The goal of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a portable preimpact fall detector in detecting impending falls before the body impacts on the ground. It was hypothesized that a single sensor with the appropriate kinematics measurements and detection algorithms, located near the body center of gravity, would be able to distinguish an in-progress and unrecoverable fall from nonfalling activities. The apparatus was tested in an array of daily nonfall activities of young (n=10) and elderly (n=14) subjects, and simulated fall activities of young subjects. A threshold detection method was used with the magnitude of inertial frame vertical velocity as the main variable to separate the nonfall and fall activities. The algorithm was able to detect all fall events at least 70 ms before the impact. With the threshold adapted to each individual subject, all falls were detected successfully, and no false alarms occurred. This portable preimpact fall detection apparatus will lead to the development of a new generation inflatable hip pad for preventing fall-related hip fractures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2007.916282

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, G., & Xue, S.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
ORCID
Wu, Ge
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2008-04
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
178-183
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W2152449912
Cited by
227
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
FWCI
11.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r43ag022265-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (1R43AG022265-01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
fall detection, inertial sensors, hip fracture prevention, falls in older adults, wearable sensors, fall-related injuries
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Accidental Falls, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Equipment Design, Feasibility Studies, Female, Hip Fractures, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Protective Clothing, Sensitivity and Specificity, Transducers, Reproducibility of Results, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Equipment Failure Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review