Cited by 148Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsTechnology Use by Older Adults

Fall detection with body-worn sensors: A systematic review

for the FARSEEING Consortium and the FARSEEING Meta Database Consensus Group, Schwickert, L., Becker, C., Lindemann, U., Maréchal, C., Bourke, A., Chiari, L., Helbostad, J.L. +5 more·2013·Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie

Abstract

Background and aims Falls among older people remain a major public health challenge. Body-worn sensors are needed to improve the understanding of the underlying mechanisms and kinematics of falls. The aim of this systematic review is to assemble, extract and critically discuss the information available in published studies, as well as the characteristics of these investigations (fall documentation and technical characteristics).Methods The searching of publically accessible electronic literature databases for articles on fall detection with body-worn sensors identified a collection of 96 records (33 journal articles, 60 conference proceedings and 3 project reports) published between 1998 and 2012. These publications were analysed by two independent expert reviewers. Information was extracted into a custom-built data form and processed using SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).Results The main findings were the lack of agreement between the methodology and documentation protocols (study, fall reporting and technical characteristics) used in the studies, as well as a substantial lack of real-world fall recordings. A methodological pitfall identified in most articles was the lack of an established fall definition. The types of sensors and their technical specifications varied considerably between studies.Conclusion Limited methodological agreement between sensor-based fall detection studies using body-worn sensors was identified. Published evidence-based support for commercially available fall detection devices is still lacking. A worldwide research group consensus is needed to address fundamental issues such as incident verification, the establishment of guidelines for fall reporting and the development of a common fall definition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00391-013-0559-8

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
for the FARSEEING Consortium and the FARSEEING Meta Database Consensus Group, Schwickert, L., Becker, C., Lindemann, U., Maréchal, C., Bourke, A., Chiari, L., Helbostad, J. L., Zijlstra, W., Aminian, K., Todd, C., Bandinelli, S., & Klenk, J.
Affiliations
  • Robert Bosch Hospital (DE)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • German Sport University Cologne (DE)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze (IT)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Becker, C.
  • Klenk, J.
Venue
Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie
Published
2013-11-24
Volume
46
Issue
8
Pages
706-719
ISSN
  • 0948-6704 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1269
OpenAlex
W2127108064
Cited by
148
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1
FWCI
41.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
fall detection, wearable sensors, falls in older adults, methodological agreement
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Humans, Transducers, Telemedicine, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Evidence-Based Medicine, Actigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review