Cited by 885Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesDigital Image Processing TechniquesConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization

On the Foundations of Relaxation Labeling Processes

Hummel, Robert A., Zucker, Steven W.·1983·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

A large class of problems can be formulated in terms of the assignment of labels to objects. Frequently, processes are needed which reduce ambiguity and noise, and select the best label among several possible choices. Relaxation labeling processes are just such a class of algorithms. They are based on the parallel use of local constraints between labels. This paper develops a theory to characterize the goal of relaxation labeling. The theory is founded on a definition of con-sistency in labelings, extending the notion of constraint satisfaction. In certain restricted circumstances, an explicit functional exists that can be maximized to guide the search for consistent labelings. This functional is used to derive a new relaxation labeling operator. When the restrictions are not satisfied, the theory relies on variational cal-culus. It is shown that the problem of finding consistent labelings is equivalent to solving a variational inequality. A procedure nearly identical to the relaxation operator derived under restricted circum-stances serves in the more general setting. Further, a local convergence result is established for this operator. The standard relaxation labeling formulas are shown to approximate our new operator, which leads us to conjecture that successful applications of the standard methods are explainable by the theory developed here. Observations about con-vergence and generalizations to higher order compatibility relations are described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.1983.4767390

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hummel, R. A., & Zucker, S. W.
Affiliations
  • Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
1983-05
Volume
PAMI-5
Issue
3
Pages
267-287
ISSN
0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107792892
Cited by
885
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
55.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Image Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
Keywords
relaxation labeling, label assignment, constraint satisfaction, variational inequalities, relaxation operator, local convergence, noise reduction, ambiguity reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review