The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Topology preserving level set method for geometric deformable models
Abstract
Active contour and surface models, also known as deformable models, are powerful image segmentation techniques. Geometric deformable models implemented using level set methods have advantages over parametric models due to their intrinsic behavior, parameterization independence, and ease of implementation. However, a long claimed advantage of geometric deformable models-the ability to automatically handle topology changes-turns out to be a liability in applications where the object to be segmented has a known topology that must be preserved. We present a new class of geometric deformable models designed using a novel topology-preserving level set method, which achieves topology preservation by applying the simple point concept from digital topology. These new models maintain the other advantages of standard geometric deformable models including subpixel accuracy and production of nonintersecting curves or surfaces. Moreover, since the topology-preserving constraint is enforced efficiently through local computations, the resulting algorithm incurs only nominal computational overhead over standard geometric deformable models. Several experiments on simulated and real data are provided to demonstrate the performance of this new deformable model algorithm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow
Xu, C., & Prince, J. L. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/83.661186 · Cited by 4,001
Self-citation
Cited by
Fischl, B. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 · Cited by 9,526
Geometrically Accurate Topology-Correction of Cortical Surfaces Using Nonseparating Loops
Segonne, F., Pacheco, J., & Fischl, B. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2006.887364 · Cited by 992
Silhouette and stereo fusion for 3D object modeling
Hernández Esteban, C., & Schmitt, F. (2004) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2004.03.016 · Cited by 435
clDice - a Novel Topology-Preserving Loss Function for Tubular Structure Segmentation
Shit, S., Paetzold, J. C., Sekuboyina, A., Ezhov, I., Unger, A., Zhylka, A., Pluim, J. P. W., Bauer, U., & Menze, B. H. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01629 · Cited by 60
“As a comparison, [17] needs O(c2mlog(m)) (see [15]) complexity to compute the 1d persistent homology where d is the number of points with zero gradients in the prediction and m is the number of simplices.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, X., Xu, C., & Prince, J. L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 755-768
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139383790
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topology preserving level set method for geometric deformable models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2003.1201824
- The paper
- Han, X., Xu, C., & Prince, J. L. (2003). Topology preserving level set method for geometric deformable models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2003.1201824
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.