The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shape Classification Using the Inner-Distance
Abstract
Part structure and articulation are of fundamental importance in computer and human vision. We propose using the inner-distance to build shape descriptors that are robust to articulation and capture part structure. The inner-distance is defined as the length of the shortest path between landmark points within the shape silhouette. We show that it is articulation insensitive and more effective at capturing part structures than the Euclidean distance. This suggests that the inner-distance can be used as a replacement for the Euclidean distance to build more accurate descriptors for complex shapes, especially for those with articulated parts. In addition, texture information along the shortest path can be used to further improve shape classification. With this idea, we propose three approaches to using the inner-distance. The first method combines the inner-distance and multidimensional scaling (MDS) to build articulation invariant signatures for articulated shapes. The second method uses the inner-distance to build a new shape descriptor based on shape contexts. The third one extends the second one by considering the texture information along shortest paths. The proposed approaches have been tested on a variety of shape databases, including an articulated shape data set, MPEG7 CE-Shape-1, Kimia silhouettes, the ETH-80 data set, two leaf data sets, and a human motion silhouette data set. In all the experiments, our methods demonstrate effective performance compared with other algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A performance evaluation of local descriptors
Mikolajczyk, K., & Schmid, C. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.188 · Cited by 6,723
Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.
Biederman, I. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.115 · Cited by 5,621
Cited by
Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Clouds
Wang, Y., Sun, Y., Liu, Z., Sarma, S. E., Bronstein, M. M., & Solomon, J. M. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/3326362 · Cited by 7,199
Robust Part-Based Hand Gesture Recognition Using Kinect Sensor
Ren, Z., Yuan, J., Meng, J., & Zhang, Z. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2013.2246148 · Cited by 746
Grauman, K., & Leibe, B. (2011) · Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning · doi:10.2200/s00332ed1v01y201103aim011 · Cited by 126
Folding clothes autonomously: A complete pipeline
Doumanoglou, A., Stria, J., Peleka, G., Mariolis, I., Petrik, V., Kargakos, A., Wagner, L., Hlavac, V., Kim, T.-K., & Malassiotis, S. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2016.2602376 · Cited by 122
Learning Weight Uncertainty with Stochastic Gradient MCMC for Shape Classification
Li, C., Stevens, A., Chen, C., Pu, Y., Gan, Z., & Carin, L. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.611 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Ling, H., & Jacobs, D. W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 286-299
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- OpenAlex
- W2165414070
- Cited by
- 1,069
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 60.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shape Classification Using the Inner-Distance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2007.41
- The paper
- Ling, H., & Jacobs, D. W. (2007). Shape Classification Using the Inner-Distance. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2007.41
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.