Cited by 122Robot Manipulation and Learning3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisSoft Robotics and Applications

Folding clothes autonomously: A complete pipeline

Doumanoglou, Andreas, Stria, Jan, Peleka, Georgia, Mariolis, Ioannis, Petrik, Vladimir, Kargakos, Andreas, Wagner, Libor, Hlavac, Vaclav +2 more·2016·IEEE Transactions on Robotics

Abstract

This work presents a complete pipeline for folding a pile of clothes using a dual-armed robot. This is a challenging task both from the viewpoint of machine vision and robotic manipulation. The presented pipeline is comprised of the following parts: isolating and picking up a single garment from a pile of crumpled garments, recognizing its category, unfolding the garment using a series of manipulations performed in the air, placing the garment roughly flat on a work table, spreading it, and, finally, folding it in several steps. The pile is segmented into separate garments using color and texture information, and the ideal grasping point is selected based on the features computed from a depth map. The recognition and unfolding of the hanging garment are performed in an active manner, utilizing the framework of active random forests to detect grasp points, while optimizing the robot actions. The spreading procedure is based on the detection of deformations of the garment's contour. The perception for folding employs fitting of polygonal models to the contour of the observed garment, both spread and already partially folded. We have conducted several experiments on the full pipeline producing very promising results. To our knowledge, this is the first work addressing the complete unfolding and folding pipeline on a variety of garments, including T-shirts, towels, and shorts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tro.2016.2602376

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doumanoglou, A., Stria, J., Peleka, G., Mariolis, I., Petrik, V., Kargakos, A., Wagner, L., Hlavac, V., Kim, T.-K., & Malassiotis, S.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
  • Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
Published
2016-12
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
1461-1478
ISSN
  • 1552-3098 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0468
OpenAlex
W2530616813
Cited by
122
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Robotics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (FP7-ICT-288553)
  • CloPeMa (Clothes Perception and Manipulation)
  • TRADR (FP7-ICT-609763)
  • Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (TE01020197)
  • Agency of the Czech Technical University in Prague (SGS15/204/OHK3/3T/13, SGS15/203/OHK3/3T/13)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/J012106/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
Keywords
dual-arm robot, robotic manipulation, depth images

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review