Cited by 201Face recognition and analysisFace and Expression RecognitionBiometric Identification and Security

3D Face Recognition Using Simulated Annealing and the Surface Interpenetration Measure

Queirolo, C.C., Silva, L., Bellon, O.R.P., Segundo, M.P.·2010·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

This paper presents a novel automatic framework to perform 3D face recognition. The proposed method uses a Simulated Annealing-based approach (SA) for range image registration with the Surface Interpenetration Measure (SIM), as similarity measure, in order to match two face images. The authentication score is obtained by combining the SIM values corresponding to the matching of four different face regions: circular and elliptical areas around the nose, forehead, and the entire face region. Then, a modified SA approach is proposed taking advantage of invariant face regions to better handle facial expressions. Comprehensive experiments were performed on the FRGC v2 database, the largest available database of 3D face images composed of 4,007 images with different facial expressions. The experiments simulated both verification and identification systems and the results compared to those reported by state-of-the-art works. By using all of the images in the database, a verification rate of 96.5 percent was achieved at a False Acceptance Rate (FAR) of 0.1 percent. In the identification scenario, a rank-one accuracy of 98.4 percent was achieved. To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest rank-one score ever achieved for the FRGC v2 database when compared to results published in the literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2009.14

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Queirolo, C. C., Silva, L., Bellon, O. R. P., & Segundo, M. P.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2010-02
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
206-219
ISSN
0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106309519
Cited by
201
References
41
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 23
FWCI
20.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
Keywords
3D face recognition, simulated annealing, range image registration, similarity measures, facial expression robustness, face verification, face identification
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Face, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Databases, Factual, Artifacts, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Principal Component Analysis, Biometric Identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review