The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Deep Matrix Factorization Method for Learning Attribute Representations
Open accessAbstract
Semi-Non-negative Matrix Factorization is a technique that learns a low-dimensional representation of a dataset that lends itself to a clustering interpretation. It is possible that the mapping between this new representation and our original data matrix contains rather complex hierarchical information with implicit lower-level hidden attributes, that classical one level clustering methodologies cannot interpret. In this work we propose a novel model, Deep Semi-NMF, that is able to learn such hidden representations that allow themselves to an interpretation of clustering according to different, unknown attributes of a given dataset. We also present a semi-supervised version of the algorithm, named Deep WSF, that allows the use of (partial) prior information for each of the known attributes of a dataset, that allows the model to be used on datasets with mixed attribute knowledge. Finally, we show that our models are able to learn low-dimensional representations that are better suited for clustering, but also classification, outperforming Semi-Non-negative Matrix Factorization, but also other state-of-the-art methodologies variants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 · Cited by 21,728
Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks
Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1127647 · Cited by 20,928
Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71 · Cited by 13,733
The Hungarian method for the assignment problem
Kuhn, H. W. (1955) · Naval Research Logistics Quarterly · doi:10.1002/nav.3800020109 · Cited by 13,120
Wold, S., Esbensen, K., & Geladi, P. (1987) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9 · Cited by 11,606
ALGORITHMS FOR NON-NEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION
Lee, D. D., & Seung, H. S. (2000) · Cited by 7,952
Paatero, P., & Tapper, U. (1994) · Environmetrics · doi:10.1002/env.3170050203 · Cited by 6,023
Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks
Bengio, Y., Lamblin, P., Popovici, D., & Larochelle, H. (2007) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0024 · Cited by 4,841
ALGORITHMS FOR NON-NEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION
Seung, D., & Lee, L.-W. (2001) · Cited by 4,753
Cited by
A Robust Moving Object Detection in Multi-Scenario Big Data for Video Surveillance
Chen, B.-H., Shi, L.-F., & Ke, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2018.2828606 · Cited by 58
Deep learning of smartphone sensor data for personal health assistance
Li, H., & Trocan, M. (2019) · Microelectronics Journal · doi:10.1016/j.mejo.2018.01.015 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Trigeorgis, G., Bousmalis, K., Zafeiriou, S., & Schuller, B. W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2017-03-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 417-429
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- OpenAlex
- W2108433027
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 18.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Deep Matrix Factorization Method for Learning Attribute Representations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2016.2554555
- The paper
- Trigeorgis, G., Bousmalis, K., Zafeiriou, S., & Schuller, B. W. (2017). A Deep Matrix Factorization Method for Learning Attribute Representations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2016.2554555
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.