Cited by 3,025Image Retrieval and Classification TechniquesAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

NUS-WIDE: a real-world web image database from National University of Singapore

Chua, Tat-Seng, Tang, Jinhui, Hong, Richang, Li, Haojie, Luo, Zhiping, Zheng, Yantao·2009·Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval

Abstract

This paper introduces a web image dataset created by NUS's Lab for Media Search. The dataset includes: (1) 269,648 images and the associated tags from Flickr, with a total of 5,018 unique tags; (2) six types of low-level features extracted from these images, including 64-D color histogram, 144-D color correlogram, 73-D edge direction histogram, 128-D wavelet texture, 225-D block-wise color moments extracted over 5x5 fixed grid partitions, and 500-D bag of words based on SIFT descriptions; and (3) ground-truth for 81 concepts that can be used for evaluation. Based on this dataset, we highlight characteristics of Web image collections and identify four research issues on web image annotation and retrieval. We also provide the baseline results for web image annotation by learning from the tags using the traditional k-NN algorithm. The benchmark results indicate that it is possible to learn effective models from sufficiently large image dataset to facilitate general image retrieval.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1646396.1646452

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These general image datasets have a large number of pictures and rich types, but their image resolution is below 500×500, which does not meet the needs of operations such as blurring, scaling and watermark.

    “These datasets have a large number of pictures and rich types, but the images resolution below 500 500, which does not meet the needs of operations such as blurring, scaling and watermark.”
  • Previous studies have generally transformed and generated training sets on the basis of general image datasets such as ImageNet [40], NUS WIDE [41] and MS COCO [42].

    “Previous studies have generally transformed and generated training sets on the basis of general image datasets such as ImageNet [40], NUS WIDE [41] and MS COCO [42].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chua, T.-S., Tang, J., Hong, R., Li, H., Luo, Z., & Zheng, Y.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • National University of Singapore, Singapore
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval
Publisher
ACM
Published
2009-07-08
Pages
1-9
OpenAlex
W2007972815
Cited by
3,025
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 140 · 2025: 229 · 2024: 244 · 2023: 239 · 2022: 226 · 2021: 262 · 2020: 247 · 2019: 275 · 2018: 212 · 2017: 170 · 2016: 150 · 2015: 171 · 2014: 120 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 104
FWCI
65.83
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval (CIVR) (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
National University of Singapore
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
image annotation, image retrieval, Flickr, image tags, low-level image features, color histogram, color correlogram, edge direction histogram, color moments, k-nearest neighbors, media search

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review