The DOI matches its Crossref record; 189 of the 189 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structured Pruning for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
The remarkable performance of deep Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is generally attributed to their deeper and wider architectures, which can come with significant computational costs. Pruning neural networks has thus gained interest since it effectively lowers storage and computational costs. In contrast to weight pruning, which results in unstructured models, structured pruning provides the benefit of realistic acceleration by producing models that are friendly to hardware implementation. The special requirements of structured pruning have led to the discovery of numerous new challenges and the development of innovative solutions. This article surveys the recent progress towards structured pruning of deep CNNs. We summarize and compare the state-of-the-art structured pruning techniques with respect to filter ranking methods, regularization methods, dynamic execution, neural architecture search, the lottery ticket hypothesis, and the applications of pruning. While discussing structured pruning algorithms, we briefly introduce the unstructured pruning counterpart to emphasize their differences. Furthermore, we provide insights into potential research opportunities in the field of structured pruning. A curated list of neural network pruning papers can be found at: https://github.com/he-y/Awesome-Pruning. A dedicated website offering a more interactive comparison of structured pruning methods can be found at: https://huggingface.co/spaces/he-yang/Structured-Pruning-Survey.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Exploiting Generative AI to Scale up Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Jakubův, J., Chvalovský, K., Goertzel, Z., Kaliszyk, C., Olšák, M., Piotrowski, B., Schulz, S., Suda, M., & Urban, J. (2023) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/lipics.itp.2023.19 · Cited by 76,658
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803
Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.243 · Cited by 48,566
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., & Eckstein, J. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000016 · Cited by 17,075
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning
Lillicrap, T. P., Hunt, J. J., Pritzel, A., Heess, N., Erez, T., Tassa, Y., Silver, D., & Wierstra, D. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.02971 · Cited by 10,782
Research works printed but not linked: 92
- Han, Deep compression: Compressing deep neural networks with pruning, trained quantization and Huffman coding
- Simonyan, Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition
- Han, Learning both weights and connections for efficient neural network, 1135
- Denton, Exploiting linear structure within convolutional networks for efficient evaluation, 1269
- Li, Pruning filters for efficient convnets
- 10.48550/ARXIV.1706.03762 · DOI · Paper page
- Hoefler, 2021, Sparsity in deep learning: Pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networks, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 22, 1
- Yvinec, RED: Looking for redundancies for data-freestructured compression of deep neural networks, 20863
- Sui, Chip: Channel independence-based pruning for compact neural networks, 24604
- Tan, DropNet: Reducing neural network complexity via iterative pruning, 9356
- Ye, Good subnetworks provably exist: Pruning via greedy forward selection, 10820
- Zhuang, Discrimination-aware channel pruning for deep neural networks, 883
- Liebenwein, Provable filter pruning for efficient neural networks
- You, Gate decorator: Global filter pruning method for accelerating deep convolutional neural networks
- Zhuang, Neuron-level structured pruning using polarization regularizer, 9865
- Ye, Rethinking the smaller-norm-less-informative assumption in channel pruning of convolution layers
- Kang, Operation-aware soft channel pruning using differentiable masks, 5122
- Tang, SCOP: Scientific control for reliable neural network pruning, 10936
- 10.5555/3157096.3157329 · doi:10.5555/3157096.3157329
- Chen, Only train once: A one-shot neural network training and pruning framework, 19637
- Wang, Neural pruning via growing regularization
- Molchanov, Pruning convolutional neural networks for resource efficient inference
- Peng, Collaborative channel pruning for deep networks, 5113
- Wang, Eigendamage: Structured pruning in the kronecker-factored eigenbasis, 6566
- Liu, Group Fisher pruning for practical network compression, 7021
- Nonnenmacher, SOSP: Efficiently capturing global correlations by second-order structured pruning
- Dai, Compressing neural networks using the variational information bottleneck, 1135
- Louizos, Bayesian compression for deep learning, 3290
- Neklyudov, Structured Bayesian pruning via log-normal multiplicative noise, 6778
- Huang, Training structured neural networks through manifold identification and variance reduction
- Kusupati, Soft threshold weight reparameterization for learnable sparsity, 5544
- Lin, Dynamic model pruning with feedback
- Liu, Dynamic sparse graph for efficient deep learning
- Lin, Runtime neural pruning
- Gao, Dynamic channel pruning: Feature boosting and suppression
- Chen, Storage efficient and dynamic flexible runtime channel pruning via deep reinforcement learning, 14747
- Yu, Topology-aware network pruning using multi-stage graph embedding and reinforcement learning, 25656
- Dong, Network pruning via transformable architecture search, 760
- Liu, Rethinking the value of network pruning
- You, Drawing early-bird tickets: Towards more efficient training of deep networks
- Alizadeh, Prospect pruning: Finding trainable weights at initialization using meta-gradients
- Rachwan, Winning the lottery ahead of time: Efficient early network pruning
- Fischer, Plant’n’seek: Can you find the winning ticket?
- Cunha, Proving the lottery ticket hypothesis for convolutional neural networks
- Wang, Fast lossless neural compression with integer-only discrete flows, 22562
- Kim, Neuron merging: Compensating for pruned neurons, 585
- Meng, Pruning filter in filter, 17629
- Zhong, Revisit kernel pruning with lottery regulated grouped convolutions
- Tanaka, Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flow, 6377
- Lee, A signal propagation perspective for pruning neural networks at initialization
- Bartoldson, The generalization-stability tradeoff in neural network pruning, 20852
- Orseau, Logarithmic pruning is all you need, 2925
- Yang, PROXSGD: Training structured neural networks under regularization and constraints
- Ding, Global sparse momentum SGD for pruning very deep neural networks, 6382
- Barsbey, Heavy tails in SGD and compressibility of overparametrized neural networks, 29364
- Miao, Learning pruning-friendly networks via Frank-Wolfe: One-shot, any-sparsity, and no retraining
- Zhang, One-shot pruning of recurrent neural networks by Jacobian spectrum evaluation
- Peste, AC/DC: Alternating compressed/decompressed training of deep neural networks, 8557
- Lee, Layer-adaptive sparsity for the magnitude-based pruning
- Liebenwein, Compressing neural networks: Towards determining the optimal layer-wise decomposition, 8557
- Liu, Frequency-domain dynamic pruning for convolutional neural networks, 1051
- Golkar, Continual learning via neural pruning
- Li, Revisiting discriminator in GAN compression: A generator-discriminator cooperative compression scheme, 28560
- Reed, 2022, A generalist agent, Trans. Mach. Learn. Res.
- Serra, Scaling up exact neural network compression by RELU stability, 27081
- 10.1007/978-3-031-20083-0_42 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20083-0_42
- Gui, Model compression with adversarial robustness: A unified optimization framework, 2116
- Chen, Linearity grafting: Relaxed neuron pruning helps certifiable robustness, 3760
- Madaan, Adversarial neural pruning with latent vulnerability suppression, 6575
- Baykal, Data-dependent coresets for compressing neural networks with applications to generalization bounds
- 10.1155/2019/1978154 · doi:10.1155/2019/1978154
- Nitanda, Stochastic proximal gradient descent with acceleration techniques, 1574
- Kingma, Variational dropout and the local reparameterization trick, 2575
- 10.1137/1015034 · doi:10.1137/1015034
- LeCun, Optimal brain damage, 598
- Hassibi, Second order derivatives for network pruning: Optimal brain surgeon, 164
- Martens, Optimizing neural networks with kronecker-factored approximate curvature, 2408
- George, Fast approximate natural gradient descent in a kronecker factored eigenbasis, 9573
- Xiao, Dual averaging method for regularized stochastic learning and online optimization, 2116
- Srinivas, Gaussian process optimization in the bandit setting: No regret and experimental design, 1015
- Guo, Dynamic network surgery for efficient DNNs, 1387
- Hua, Channel gating neural networks, 1886
- Kipf, Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks
- Chen, Stochastic gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, 1683
- Frankle, Linear mode connectivity and the lottery ticket hypothesis, 3259
- Lee, Snip: Single-shot network pruning based on connection sensitivity
- Wang, Picking winning tickets before training by preserving gradient flow
- Jacot, Neural tangent kernel: Convergence and generalization in neural networks, 8580
- Lubana, A gradient flow framework for analyzing network pruning
- Renda, Comparing rewinding and fine-tuning in neural network pruning
- Yang, Dataset pruning: Reducing training data by examining generalization influence
- Guo, Sparse DNNs with improved adversarial robustness, 240
Cited by
Raza, S. M., Abidi, S. M. H., Masuduzzaman, M., & Shin, S. Y. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.131357 · Cited by 13
Nguyen-Le, H.-H., Tran, V.-T., Nguyen, D.-T., & Le-Khac, N.-A. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-026-11608-4 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- He, Y., & Xiao, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2024-05
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2900-2919
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- 1939-3539
- OpenAlex
- W4389104738
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 189
- FWCI
- 33.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- Funders
- A*STAR Centre for Frontier AI Research
- CFAR Internship Award and Research Excellence
- A*STAR Science and Engineering Research Council
- Maritime AI Research Programme (SMI-2022-MTP-06)
- Singapore Maritime Institute
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structured Pruning for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2023.3334614
- The paper
- He, Y., & Xiao, L. (2024). Structured Pruning for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2023.3334614
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.